Gear matters

On May 29, 2010 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

5.1 miles at Eisenhower Park

Today’s run (Eisenhower Park): 5.1 miles @ 9:23 per mile

I’ve said it before but I’ll say it again: gear matters. I’m beginning to understand that a person’s running pace is related to both their physical abilities as well as the unique conditions and variables that make up a run. Hills and heat can slow down a runner while the right weather can make a run feel effortless. A shirt that fails to wick moisture can contribute to overheating and ill fitting socks or uncomfortable running shorts can distract from a runner’s focus. Every variable can yield a positive or negative influence on performance. What is a quick drying shirt worth to you on a hot, humid day? I’d say plenty. What about running shoes?

If you asked me a month ago what I averaged for pace I would have said that I run between 9:05-9:25 per mile. In a race I’d usually beat the low end of that by 20-30 seconds. Again, it’s the conditions that make the difference with all those other runners helping to sweep you along. Recently I’ve been alternating between my mainstay Brooks Adrenalin GTS 10’s and two pairs of lightweight Saucony running shoes. When I run in the Brooks I’m a solid low-9:00 miler. If I’d needed heavy motion control shoes I might be working hard to regularly break 10 minute miles. When I run in the Saucony Kinvaras I often attain paces below 9:00 per mile. If I’d always run in the Kinvaras I’d have considered myself a sub-9 minute mile runner all along.

The Saucony Grid Tangent 4’s provide an even greater boost. I regularly run 8:40 minute miles with the Tangents which I consider to be a decent 5K race pace. I haven’t yet raced in these shoes but I’m hoping the combination of speed boost from the shoes plus a faster pace through competition will help me beat my racing PR of 8:19 per mile. My next race is an 8K that pushed my limits last year so it will be interesting to see how the variables work on that day.

This morning I returned to Eisenhower Park to run the paths, some of which I’d traveled on a Red Cross walkathon with my family earlier in the month. I locked onto a course defined by arrows painted on the ground and followed that all around until I found myself back near where I’d started. I took a more free range route from there, circumnavigating the big pond where people sail three foot remote controlled sailboats and then passed through the Veteran’s Memorial gardens. At that point I began to hear the sound of a marching band blasting out patriotic music as was fitting on this Memorial Day weekend. I finished after completing five miles and while my speed wasn’t impressive it was definitely a good workout. So perhaps I may have covered more distance at a faster speed were I wearing my Sauconys. Gear definitely matters but between the GTS 10’s and the Tangent 4’s, it’s all good.

Test new running shoes? Yes, please

On May 7, 2010 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

The new Saucony Kinvara

Today’s run: Central Park (planned)

I was recently contacted by a PR person from Saucony about an opportunity to try their new Kinvara lightweight trainer. This shoe is more neutral than what I’d normally wear but I’m interested in its low profile with a heel-to-forefoot ratio of 18/14 mm. I haven’t forgotten about mid foot running but my Brooks GTS-10’s are so great I would be reluctant to give them up. Given their unique nature, and their low profile the Kinvaras may make a great addition to the Emerging Runner’s collection of running shoes. Besides the Brooks GTS-10’s I also have pairs of GTS-9’s and ASICS GEL-1130’s. On the trail side I have Helly Hansen Trail Lizards for the toughest technical terrain, Adidas Response 15’s for multi-surfaced trail and street running and some NB 460’s that fit and perform really well despite being a “value priced” shoe.

Left out of this collection are any lightweight trainers or racing shoes. I was very interested in the Brooks Green Silence when it was announced but when the time came I opted for the 10’s to replace my 600+ mile 9’s. I signed up for (and was accepted to) Brook’s test program but I have not been contacted to try anything. Even if I do I won’t be able to talk about the shoes or mention them on this blog, per the terms of the program. No problem there, the chance to try Brooks experimental shoes is worth the silence, green or otherwise. I’m happy to try any running shoes or gear that companies want to send to me to review. I’d even try Nikes but not those silly ones with the shock absorbers on the heel.

I’m planning another Central Park run today and I’m hoping to cover some new ground north of the reservoir. I keep hearing about the hills up there and I’ll see how well my training has paid off.

Will Runner’s World start covering hedge funds now?

On February 26, 2010 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Yesterday morning my friend Sedentary Man handed me a section from the Wall Street Journal and said I’d probably want to read this article entitled “We have ways of helping you buy running shoes.” I think that was supposed to be a play on the way German officers would threaten torture in old WWII movies. If that was the case the writer missed her mark because the article described four complex but helpful experiences that led to her being fit with the right running shoes. The writer referred to herself with the royal “we” throughout the article which I found odd but, that aside, I thought she did a good job researching the buying process. She visited four running stores, three in the state of Washington and one in NYC. I recently went through this experience at Jackrabbit so I was curious to see how these other stores performed their evaluations.

Three out of the four stores performed gait analysis using video and a treadmill. A doctor who was quoted in the story said that the video process is “gimmicky” but I disagree with that. Seeing myself pronate in hi-def convinced me that I needed a moderate stability shoe. One store used a pressure sensitive mat that changed color based on weight distribution. A couple of stores had the writer run barefoot on the treadmill. I thought that was weird because most people heel strike but will never do that when running barefoot so what does it prove?

In the end it seemed like each store did a good job of identifying the right shoe for the writer. I was amused to read that she tried on a pair of “Mizunas” and I’m sure the Mizuno people loved reading that!

This morning I considered my choices for my daily workout: run, strength conditioning, another elliptical session or shoveling the newly fallen (and still falling) snow on our driveway. A look out the window confirmed the report of 3″-8″ with 5 inches on the ground at 4:00 AM. I decided that my car could blast through that provided I escape before the town plows come by and deposit 20″ of hard pack in front of the driveway.

I decided to stay inside and started with the Lolo core exercises that I found in Runner’s World last year. I really like them because they only take 15 minutes but you feel like you’ve accomplished something when you’ve finished. I followed that with about 20 minutes of hand weights. I only used 5 and 10 pound weights because I wanted to do lots of reps and start a baseline for arm and upper body conditioning. I left for the train before the snowplows came. Standing on the snowy LIRR platform I was happy to see the train come in and I was glad that I started my day with a different but energizing workout.

Spending time in my happy place

On January 27, 2010 By Emerging Runner2 Comments

I like to run because it’s fun and healthy and it provides an opportunity to measure progress in scientific way. There’s a lot of science in the sport of running and as a technologist I appreciate learning the physics of the sport and understanding the ways that changes to form and style can increase the efficiency and speed of a runner. On the other hand, while running is as simple as it gets in terms of sports, there’s a whole lot of cool technology available to satisfy my inner tech geek.

I like to look at running stuff in stores, everything from clothes, to tech accessories, to shoes. Especially shoes. Running shoes are cool. They are like little high performance sports cars designed to help a runner reach his or her potential. I love the subtle differences that represent competitive advantage between companies. Each company serves a segment of the market. While I’m no fan of Nike they do have some great performance shoes and have actively responded to the minimalist running movement with the Frees. ASICS makes great performing shoes that feel great. They are the luxury cars of the running world. Brooks makes purposeful shoes with great designs and very smart technologies. They are my favorite shoe company and part of the reason for that is their focus on putting sustainable materials into their shoes. There’s probably a dozen more companies I could mention that differentiate in interesting ways.

I was in the mood so I walked the two blocks to City Sports yesterday to see what was new. I only spent 20 minutes there during lunch but I had a great time looking at the new models and the niche brands like Karhu, Newton and Zoot. I finally tried on the Brooks GTS-10’s and I have to say they lived up to their reviews. I love my 9’s but the 10’s fit, wrap and spring off the forefoot were much improved. I’m still considering a more minimal/front strike shoe like the NB M800, the Newton’s or Brook’s new Green Silence which has a mere 8mm offset from heel to toe. I didn’t buy anything yesterday but I left happy.

I’m also happy to note that I ran about 2.25 miles on the treadmill this morning. According to the Garmin my pace was around 9:40 but that seems faster than the moderate pace I attempted to maintain. I did focus on front foot landing throughout the run so perhaps I managed more speed with less effort. I was glad to get back into the week day running routine and I’m fully energized for the work day. That makes me happy too.

Mea Culpa on the run. Now what’s my next shoe?

On January 16, 2010 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Although it did not seem to affect me negatively, yesterday’s treadmill run was clearly too much too soon. After weeks of illness I began to feel strong enough to run a few minutes to benchmark my current conditioning. What was supposed to be 5 minutes of slow running turned into 12 or 13 minutes of slow to moderate running – enough to work a sweat. Up until that point I followed my doctor’s advice to the letter and that brought me to the point where I felt strong enough to try this run. I had walked about a mile on Tuesday. Yesterday afternoon I walked for 30 minutes without feel tired. I’m getting there.

I finished my course of Avelox yesterday and I’m working through my second course of Tamiflu to ensure my Type B flu is eradicated. I’m sleeping more than I had prior to contracting pneumonia but I’m finding that I need less and less sleep each day. The real test will come next week when I return to waking at a very early hour so I can make my 6:20 AM train. I won’t be running Tuesday morning but if my doctor allows it I’ll try a short neighborhood run on Monday. I certainly didn’t mind being on the treadmill yesterday. In fact you could say I loved every second of the experience. Much of that was due to the realization that I could still run and that I wasn’t transported back to mid-2008 when I struggled to cover a few long streets without a break.

I’ve been looking at the Brooks Running site and wondering whether the Green Silence is my next running shoe. I’ll admit that I’m still very curious to compare the Adrenalin GTS-10’s to my GTS-9’s and I wonder if anything could ever feel so good on my feet as the ASICS Kayano’s. Life has many many choices and I like having options. The question is this: should I be true to the idea that less is more and that the best thing to do is to return to running with minimalist shoes? Or should I be seduced by the great new technologies introduced for 2010? Then again, those GTS-9’s are still a mighty fine pair of running shoes.

My favorite app (hint: it has something to do with running shoes)

On November 13, 2009 By Emerging Runner2 Comments

Without a doubt my favorite iPhone app is the Runner’s World Shoe Shop. This free app has a simple interface that enables quick navigation across the 250 or so running shoes reviewed by the magazine. The company that created this app, NearbyNow, has a holiday gift guide featuring items from retailers and fashion magazines that works in the same way as the shoe app but the content isn’t very rich. I give Runner’s World a lot of credit for its elegant implementation that includes some nice store and price finder features.

I don’t know exactly why I like running shoes so much. It may be due to my interest in technology or the fact that there seems to be so many interesting differentiators between models and brands. I’ll never be a competitive runner but I want to do the best I can and it all starts with the shoe. I think it’s interesting that when I made my commitment to running a year ago I simply put myself at the mercy of a Foot Locker sales person who sold me a pair of Nikes with no conversation about how I run or whether I pronate. Those shoes worked okay until I reached 300 miles where I began to have problems with my left leg. Those problems exacerbated to the point that I debated running a 5K in trail shoes to avoid further injury.

Looking back, those Nikes were decent shoes and I did end up running the 5K in them, coming in 2nd in my age category. I retired them the next day once I purchased the Brooks GTS-9 Adrenalins. The Brooks did not impress me right away but after almost 400 miles they’ve never given me a problem (except for the occasional pinching issue at the top of my foot). I check in with the Runner’s World Shoe Shop on a daily basis looking for information that will guide me to my next pair. I wish it had more updates and covered more of the specialty brands like Newton but I’m still very pleased with what they offer today. Plus, the price is right.

Tempted by choices at DSW

On November 9, 2009 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Four days out of the week I wear a suit to work but on Fridays I usually wear more comfortable “business casual” clothing. I usually wear a pair of Bass loafers on those days and I noticed some scuffing recently that prompted a visit to DSW to look for a new pair. DSW is a huge shoe store that sits imposingly high above the other stores in the area. Downstairs are hundreds of women’s shoes and bags on display. My wife told me, amused, that they were selling a pair of shoes “discounted” to $800. Overall, the prices were actually very good and most everything else was priced well. I headed upstairs to look for new loafers but the athletic shoe section caught my eye and I spent some time with my son looking at and trying on some nice models from Saucony, ASICS, Brooks, Mizuno and others.

These weren’t the low end models that you always find on sale at Sports Authority. They had ASICS Kayano-14’s for $89.00 (but not in my size) and Brooks Trance 8’s for $99 that were in my size. I tried the three Mizuno models, some Saucony trail shoes (really nice fit) and a few assorted others. It’s obvious why the shoes were cheap – they were last year’s models or older – but if I was ready to buy I would have been happy with the choices. My son, the 10 year old grownup, finally laid down the law and made me look at loafers. I found a nice pair at a good price and left happy. I would have liked those Trance 8’s too. Maybe next time.

Later in the day we all headed to the track. My wife didn’t have an opportunity to fit in her workout that morning and my daughter wanted to run. I took the opportunity to run some easy laps that I alternated with faster paced segments. I also did a few 200m “sprints” at around 7:15/mile. It was a far quicker pace than I normally run but slow enough to prevent any injuries. Overall it was a very nice weekend for running and the cool, maple-scented air added much to the experience. I’m thinking of taking tomorrow as a rest day and then start focusing on my readiness for my 5K race on the 28th.

Re-committing to my GTS-9’s

On October 9, 2009 By Emerging Runner2 Comments

I’m interested in running shoes because they are the one thing that separates me from the road, trail, track or treadmill when I run. I own five pairs that I use interchangeably but the alpha pair are my Brooks Adrenalin GTS-9’s. Those who have read this blog over the last year know what a complicated relationship I have with these running shoes. I regretted the purchase as soon as I brought them home and wished I had chosen the other pair I liked: ASICS GEL 2140’s.

I chose the Brooks because, in the store, they felt better than the Saucony and New Balance models that I’d tried on that day. It was a tie between the ASICS and the Brooks and I chose the Brooks because they felt infinitesimally better. When I got home I tried them on again and noticed the tongue position caused discomfort at the top of my feet when the shoes were tightened. I also felt that the shoes lacked the bounce ands spring that defined my Nike Turbulence 13’s. After boxing them up, taking them out and trying them on again and repeating that over the next couple of days, I finally decided to keep them and in the long run that was a good decision. Yes, they still dig into the top of my feet when tightened too hard and they don’t feel as energetic as some of my other shoes but they very quickly undid the damage that my Nike’s were causing me before replacement. The cushioning of the Brooks is appreciated on longer runs and this morning I tightened only to the point of stability. No pain and a very good ride.

The cushioning properties of these shoes have made me think a bit more about moving to a lighter, less protecting pair. I’m a lot lighter myself since I started running last October and I’m intrigued by the minimal style shoes that take mass out of the mid-soles for weights in the 9-10 oz. range as opposed to the 12+ oz. weight of stability shoes like the GTS-9’s. I read a shoe review in this month’s Men’s Journal that covered minimalist running shoes. The top rated shoe was the NB 1225 that happens to be the model my friend CK just bought. He’s had some serious foot problems so I’m surprised that he’d want something so austere but he loves them. Apparently they are the best of breed for light (12 oz.) motion control shoes. Another highlighted pair were the Brooks Ghost 2 that weigh in at 10.8 ounces. I picked one up in a running store once and it felt weightless. I’d like to try that shoe since I am firmly back in the “I like Brooks” camp now.

I covered 2.5 miles at 9:03 this morning. The time flew by and I found myself a bit farther away from the house than I’d planned so I needed to put some effort into the last half mile to meet my schedule. It all worked out fine. Tomorrow I’ll try for 5-6 miles on the street and Sunday I’m running Stillwell Woods with my nephew. It’s been a while since I’ve hit the trails so I’m looking forward to the experience and hoping for cool weather.

Thinking about my next pair

On September 17, 2009 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

It’s been about five months since I bought my Brooks GTS 9’s and I’m thinking about when I’ll replace them. I already have five pairs of running shoes although three of them are for trails. My other pair of street shoes are Asics 1130’s that are perfectly serviceable but I noticed they pinched a little the last time I ran with them on the bridle trail in Central Park. The past two days I’ve done my 4:00 AM runs and noticed that I still have an issue with the way they fit at the tongue. It’s too bad because they are great shoes but I don’t know if I’d buy another pair. A friend of mine just picked up a pair of New Balance 1225’s and I started thinking about what I’d look for the next time I consider a replacement of the Brooks. At different times I vacillate between the idea of investing in a pair of high end cushioned stability shoes like the Saucony ProGrid Hurricanes or the Asics GEL-Kayano 15’s or a pair of lightweight trainers like the Mizuno Wave Universe 3. I run between 20-25 miles per week with my longest runs ranging between five and seven miles so I don’t know how these trainers would hold up in terms of comfort and support.

The mature thing to do would be to swap my low mileage Asics that I keep in my office with the Brooks that are getting close to 400 miles. I could put off my next street shoe purchase for a while if I did that. But what fun would that be!?

Brown bagging

On September 7, 2009 By Emerging Runner2 Comments

I’ve been busy reading the Runner’s World 2009 fall shoe guide on the Runner’s World iPhone app (as well as on the site and in the August print issue). After wondering whether I have flat or normal arches and if I really should be in a neutral shoe versus a stability shoe I decided to try the “wet test.”

http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/416421194

My kids and I filled a pan of water, put out a paper shopping bag and tried the test. My impression showed my foot to be somewhere between a low arch and a normal arch so a stability shoe like the Brooks Adrenalin GTS 9 was an appropriate choice. I’ve come to like this shoe although I wish it felt a bit more responsive off the forefoot. Given this test, I can probably get away with less stability so I’ll consider that when I’m ready to replace the Brooks that now serve as my primary road shoe. My daughter did the wet test and was horrified to see that she has flat feet but I explained that there’s no right or wrong to it. She loves her Saucony’s so they must be the right shoes for her. My son and my wife both had classic normal arch profiles and no one had a high arch.

Later in the day I headed to Stillwell to run some trails. I haven’t done that in a couple of weeks and the last couple of days have been tough runs for me. I was hoping that change from pavement to trails would improve my performance but I am still suffering some residual fatigue from Friday. I didn’t push too hard and avoided most of the tough hills (although I did run through a section dubbed the “Snake Pit”) and I ended up covering a little over three miles. I have not been happy with my running for a couple of weeks as I feel like I’m making no progress on pace (despite the interval work I did last Sunday) and my endurance is off. I’ll attribute this lack of strength to the fact that I’m still fending off a slight illness. At least I hope that’s why. I’m wondering if missing a couple of weekly runs with AG has softened me a little. Without her benevolent push I may be getting lazy. I’ll see how I do this week. Next Sunday morning I’m lining up for a 4-mile race.