Born that Way (running shoe version)

On August 23, 2015 By Emerging Runner2 Comments

Mister minimal at Bethpage this morning

Today’s run (Bethpage trail): 5.2 miles
Yesterday’s workout (elliptical): 50 minutes

We are who we are, no matter what we’re told to be. After the minimalist running shoe movement started by the book, “Born to Run”, I broke from the traditional style of running shoe (Nike Turbulence, Brooks Adrenaline, ASICS 1130, Saucony Grid Tangent, Adidas Response) and took delivery of a pair of Saucony Kinvaras. It was love at first run.

I put 500 miles on that pair of Kinvaras before retiring them. It was a new design and Saucony hadn’t yet figured out how to make the soles more durable. My last run in them was a nine miler at Belmont Lake the weekend before the 2011 LI Half Marathon. I finished that run with a sore knee that plagued me throughout the race and for a couple of months after that. Despite a bad end to a great experience with the Kinvaras, I was eager to explore more minimalist shoes.

The original Kinvara

I am not what most people would describe as an efficient runner but I do really well with lower, less cushioned shoes. Following the Kinvara, I ran almost 400 miles in the zero-drop Hattoris, followed by another 500 miles in a pre-production pair of Brooks Pure Drifts. I liked the connection to the road that I got with those shoes and followed the Pure Drifts with a pair of Kinvara 3s. I used the K3s on the road for over 700 miles before making them my treadmill shoes. They probably have 1,000 miles on them by now.

Last year I managed to snag a pair of ASICS Kayano 20s for the astonishingly low price of $64. I know people who swear by the Kayanos, calling them the Lexus of running shoes, for their highly cushioned but stable ride. My speed was suffering and I thought I’d change it up with a return to an old-school shoe design. My initial experience with the Kayanos was disappointing, but I like them better now, mostly as a casual weekend shoe.

Saucony provided me an opportunity to test the new Triumph ISO, a shoe similar to the Kayano but modernized and lightened. All the same, it’s a lot of shoe and it’s neither low nor minimal. With both the Triumphs and Kayanos in my stable, I should be happy, but I’ve find myself going with my semi-minimal Saucony Virratas that have close to 700 miles on them. The Virrata’s out-soles are very worn at this point and I don’t want to invite injury.

(I’ll) take Five

Yesterday I looked at shoes at one of the big box sporting goods stores and didn’t see much that excited me. They didn’t have Virratas or Kinvaras and I didn’t like the current models from Brooks, ASICS or New Balance. I may order the Kinvara 5s online (the 6s got some bad reviews because of a new lacing feature). I’m not sure they even make the Virratas anymore. Too bad, I thought it was a great shoe.

I ended up wearing my Kayanos on today’s run. The original plan was for the Runsketeers to get together at Bethpage but my buddies weren’t able to make it this morning. I parked on Colonial and ran south for about 2.5 miles before turning around for the balance of the run. Conditions were good, with no direct sun but the humidity was 83%. I brought my water bottle and that worked fine. The only problem was that 21 ounces of water is heavy to carry. I was wishing for a smaller bottle by the second mile.

Tomorrow I return to work after what felt like a very long vacation. I was happy with my running and the distance I covered. I also got in a couple of good elliptical sessions because I have some slight sciatica and the no-impact workout seems to help that. I may visit a couple of running stores next weekend in search of my next minimal running shoe. What can I say? I was born to run minimally.

The pendulum of minimalism

On April 25, 2013 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Today’s run (street): 3.3 miles

I was reading an article that said the demand for minimal-style running shoes, once a growth segment, is beginning to decline. The book, Born to Run, made many people curious about barefoot-style running, and it forced us to reconsider the merits of the shoes we’ve always bought.

A few years ago, I saw a video of myself on the treadmill at Jackrabbit Sports. That clearly confirmed that I’m an over-pronater. The salesperson recommended that I buy a beefy, medially-posted “stability” shoe to correct that tendency. After all, they said, my stride made me susceptible to knee and IT band injuries. I wished at the time that I could wear a lighter shoe, but I feared the consequences.

Hattori

I thought about all this on my run this morning. The idea that shoes with lots of cushioning would prevent certain types of injuries has been increasingly debated and challenged by many. That includes me. I wore out a a pair of Saucony Hattoris after 400 miles and I now run primarily in the Brooks Pure Drifts, Brooks’ most minimal shoe. The Hattori and Drift are both simple designs. Each shoe weighs less than 6 ounces and neither has any stability features. After more than 700 miles running in that type of shoe, I haven’t encountered a single problem.

Pure Drift

The dash toward barefoot running probably got too many people into minimal shoes too soon. Many are now going back to more cushy footwear. But the game has changed, and now even stability shoes have lighter construction. I know that many people feel that the shoe makes the runner. After 3+ years of (mostly) injury-free running, in barely-there neutral trainers, I respectfully disagree.

My speed is back, and just in time

On April 10, 2012 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Today’s run (street): 3.2 miles

After weeks of focus on distance, I’ve turned my attention more towards speed. Yesterday’s weight exercises were a good first step that provided direct benefits this morning. I decided to run in my Hattori’s today. Between the colder weather and testing out new shoes, I haven’t been wearing the Hattori’s much and I’ve missed them. When I set out for today’s run, I once again appreciated their simplicity and fit

Sorry Meb, they’re nice, but not for me

We had stopped by Famous Footwear yesterday morning to get my son some new shoes and I took the opportunity to try on a pair of Skechers Go Run’s. I’ve been intrigued by these shoes since Meb Keflezighi committed to them and the good reviews from both Running Times and Runner’s World. I don’t really consider Skechers a serious brand for running shoes, but this model seemed different.

My impression of the Go Run’s was primarily positive except for a raised part of the mid-sole that helps facilitate a mid-foot strike. I appreciated the spirit but not the execution. For some who are looking to transition to a more minimal shoe, the Go Run may be a nice option.

The Hattori’s inspired me to move and I came through the first mile at around 8:50. I maintained that pace through the second mile and then shifted into race mode until the end. I finished the 5K+ run with an overall pace of 8:32. Throughout my run, I used rapid arm motion to regulate my leg turnover and that produced my fastest training run so far this year.

Today’s run reinforced my training plan and I feel good about my preparation going into Sunday’s race. A little more speed and some end-of-week rest should get me there.

Of all my running shoes, these were the best

On April 4, 2012 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

GTS-10: like chicken soup for the sole

Today’s run (street): 2.5 miles

My feet have been bothering me lately and I’m not sure what to do about it. My wife suggested that my tendency to switch shoes, rather than sticking to one pair, may be causing the issues. She may be right. The question is which pair to use? I’ve struggled to find my perfect running shoe and I haven’t been too successful. But is the act of trying different models undermining the process?

I’ve tried a lot of shoes in the three-plus years since I’ve been running. Most were fine, some awful and a few great. But the great shoes also had their flaws. My two pair of Brooks Adrenaline’s have never disappointed (I retired the GTS-9’s after 700 miles, still using the GTS-10’s), but they are old school in design, with a high platform and ramp angle. I run with the GTS-10’s for recovery or if I detect a knee problem. A few runs in them seems to correct any issue.

The original Kinvaras were my second great model. They felt like the perfect shoe from the first time I tried them on and maintained that feel, almost to the end. But something happened and my last few runs resulted in knee pain that coincided with last year’s Half Marathon. I’m hoping the new Kinvara 3’s are sufficiently improved to ward that off after I’ve covered a few hundred miles in them.

Surprisingly, the best shoes, day in and day out, have been my Saucony Hattori’s, a shoe so minimal it lacks a mid sole. But they are incredibly runnable, comfortable and responsive. The downside is that the uppers are ripping after 300 miles. I can still wear them, but time is running out. My second pair of Hattori’s, that should feel and perform identically, don’t fit correctly on my left foot and I’ve given up on them after 67 miles. It makes me wary of getting a replacement pair for my good Hattori’s.

Right now I’m really pleased with the Spira Stingers, but I am experiencing this foot pain. I really don’t think it’s coming from these shoes and I’ll run with them exclusively until Sunday. If my foot problems improve, I’ll credit the Spiras. If they don’t, I’ll do a few runs in the GTS-10’s and hope for a quick recovery.

Stingers, Kinvaras or Hattori’s? A hard choice to make

On April 2, 2012 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Hard to argue with success

I’m less than two weeks away from running my fourth consecutive Marcie Mazzola race. The first time I ran it was in 2009 when the distance was 4 miles. The course was shortened the next year to 5K to increase the number of participants. What didn’t change was the big hill on Woodhull Road that makes up a good part of the first mile. After three races along that course, I’m actually looking forward to the hill challenge this year.

Once runners get past the big hill, the course reverts to a net negative elevation, providing some great opportunities to let loose on the downhills. I’m on the fence about which running shoes I’ll use for this race, but I’m thinking it may be between my latest two pairs: the Spira Stinger XLT’s and the Saucony Kinvara 3’s.

I’ve done my last two long runs in the Spiras and they have performed exceedingly well. I was prepared to dismiss them as a gimmick when offered the opportunity to test them on Runner’s Tech Review and I’m glad I stayed open minded. Make no mistake about this shoe – it’s lightweight, comfortable, supportive and responsive.

The Kinvara 3’s are also very nice. I loved my original Kinvaras but found the Kinvara 2’s less appealing each time I tried them on. To be fair, I never ran in them, so I don’t really know how they’d have performed. I do know that the Kinvara 3’s feel more like the original and, with their 4mm ramp angle, suit my preference for a lower platform. I have had noticeable irritation in one foot when running in these shoes, but I suspect it’s as much a foot issue as it is a shoe problem.

It’s hard to determine which of these shoes would serve me better for a fast 5K. Perhaps I’ll simply opt for door #3 and run with the venerable Hattori’s. These shoes, despite over 300 miles on their thin soles, still deliver one of the best running experiences I’ve ever encountered.

Kinvara 3 discomfort – is it me or the shoe?

On March 27, 2012 By Emerging Runner4 Comments

Today’s run (street): 2.5 miles

Quit pokin’ my plantar!

Winter returned to the New York area overnight and I stepped outside this morning into 30° temperatures. I wore the new Kinvara 3’s to see how they’d feel after my feet had an opportunity to recover from a weekend of long running. I expected the new shoes to perform in a similar way to my original Kinvaras, and they did, but I also experienced some discomfort underfoot. Much to my chagrin, the mid-sole was poking noticeably against the sock liner on the lateral plantar fascia (top left side) of my foot.

I’ve had a similar issue with my second pair of Hattori’s that cut in on the medial side, prompting me to retire them after only 70 miles. My other pair of Hattori’s fits me perfectly after 300 miles of running. The problem with the Kinvaras could be more related to me than the shoes, and I’m hoping it isn’t a design or fit problem. I went up 1/2 size on the Kinvaras because the Mirages feel slightly too snug in the toe-box, and I expected the same from the K3’s.

Perhaps that sizing up created a vertical alignment issue that resulted in this issue. I’ll run with the Kinvara 3’s again tomorrow and, if the problem continues, I’ll switch back to the Spiras for a few days. I really do like the Kinvara’s design and by the end they did feel more comfortable. I just know that if the issue continues I’ll probably end up passing them over for other, more comfortable, options.

One-line running shoe reviews

On March 5, 2012 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

It’s been a while since I’ve updated Runner’s Tech Review but I may be testing a new pair of running shoes soon. These shoes are different and the manufacturer promises to deliver measurable gains in performance. That’s always an intriguing notion, but I’ve rarely seen these claims pay off. We’ll see.

In the meantime, I’m more than ready to find a replacement for my Hattori’s that I’ve used both as a trainer and race shoe over the last year. I’m impressed that they’ve held up as well as they have after 300+ miles of pounding, but they are showing signs of wear. I have a second pair of Hattori’s that were sent to me by Saucony but something about the fit is different. I find them unwearable after 60 miles of running.

Yesterday I had a little time in the middle of the day and went over to Dick’s where I tried on a few pairs of running shoes. I didn’t find my next pair but I was glad to reinforce what I expected. Here are my quick impressions:

Adidas adizero® Rush: Light, surprisingly comfortable, smooth roll, stiff fore-foot, high platform (too much heel).
Brooks Pure Cadence: Light, cushioned, tight arch/mid foot, awkward roll, expensive.
Brooks Adrenaline 12: Extremely comfortable, natural roll, moved well with foot, high platform (too much heel).
New Balance MT20: Tight forefoot (even 1/2 size up), light, uneven roll.
Merrell Road Glove: Light, unstructured, wide toe box, lack of fore-foot response.

The New Balance experience concerned me because I’ve been waiting for the similar NB MR00 zero-drop road shoe that should be in stores soon. I’ve been hoping that will be a worthy successor to my Hattori’s. If I don’t like the way that shoe feels when I try it, I might need to wait until Saucony launches the Kinvara 3 in early summer. Even then, there’s no guarantee that I’ll like that new design. All I want is the perfect shoe. Is that too much to ask?

Looking for my winter running shoe

On December 19, 2011 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Perhaps I need some (new) balance in my running

After trying on the Kinvara 2’s only to realize it wasn’t the shoe for me, I’m back to rethinking my winter footwear. I really loved my original Kinvaras. In fact, I’d still be running in them except that I wore out the Kinvara’s mid-sole to the point where I began experiencing knee pain. That breakdown coincided with the timing of my half marathon that I ran while injured.

Green Silence – an opportunity lost

A couple of years ago I anticipated Brook’s launch of the Green Silence, their first “minimal” shoe not made specifically for racing. I couldn’t wait for them to go on sale. I ended up being dissuaded by the salesperson at Jackrabbit who steered me toward the Brooks GTS 10’s, a great shoe but it rides too high. I ended up switching to the Saucony Kinvaras midway through 2010.

The Hattori – great except on really cold days

The Mirage – a really good shoe but the fit is narrow

Earlier this year I tested the Saucony Mirage, a Kinvara-like shoe with some stability features. It’s a great shoe and I’ve put in a few hundred miles in them, but the toe width is a bit narrow. I was hoping that Brook’s new Pure Project line would provide a shoe that met my needs. I tried on the Pure Connect and really disliked the fit that was narrow and very tight in the arch. The other models weren’t much better so I decided to look elsewhere.

After looking at many reviews, I am thinking that the New Balance Minimus MR00 may be a “good fit” for me. My hope was to find a minimal, zero-drop, road shoe that will give me a little more insulation that the Hattori’s for winter running. Given that the MR00’s aren’t due in stores until March, I may need to get through most of winter in the Mirages on cold days and the Hattori’s on more moderate days and races.

A return to the Hattori’s

On November 10, 2011 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Today’s run (street): 2.5 miles

Super minimalist ninja

Hattori Hanzō was a famous ninja and samurai who lived in 16th century Japan. I’m guessing that his sword skills were the inspiration behind Saucony’s Hattori super minimalist running shoes. I’ve put about 250 miles on mine since I’ve got them and I’ve come to love their purposeful simplicity.

For the last three weeks I’ve been running in either my Saucony Mirages or Brooks GTS-10’s in an attempt to clear up a minor pain I’ve had near my right Achilles. I figured that the greater cushioning and stability control on these shoes (compared to the Hattori’s) would help my healing. It must not be the shoes because the pain remains, although it always goes away after a few minutes of running.

Since Sunday is race day, I thought I’d end my taper with a run in the Hattori’s. It’s a different experience going back to a shoe 1/3 the weight of the Brooks. I worried that my layoff from these shoes would cause me some calf pain when I returned to them, but I had no problems today. I ran okay but I’m nowhere near my late September peak. I think the Hattori’s provided some benefit over the heavier shoes this morning since I ran 30 seconds per mile faster than yesterday. However, that pace was still far off my target for the 10K. I guess I should reset my expectations for this race and defer my focus on performance until the following weekend when I run the Long Beach Turkey Trot.

Hurtin’ Hattori’s

On October 16, 2011 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Along with the damage to my Hattori’s toe box yesterday, that probably came as a result of so much downhill running during the race, I also managed to aggravate my right Achilles to the point of great discomfort. This injury has been a long time coming. I started to notice some pain at the back of that foot (just above the heel) some weeks ago, but it never became worse than an uncomfortable distraction. It wasn’t too bad after the race yesterday, but later in the day I felt some sharp pains as I walked around.

I don’t know why this problem developed. If it is the Hattori’s, I’d think the injury would have happened on both Achilles tendons. But running related injuries never seem to occur symmetrically. It could be a combination of the shoe and the way I run. I’ve been icing the area and taking Aleve since last night, and that combination has helped a lot.

I considered doing an easy run today, just to get outside, but I decided that might do more harm than good. A slow, easy recovery run wouldn’t help my conditioning and it would definitely put more strain on the Achilles. I’m probably going to do most of my running in the Mirages over the next two weeks to see if that helps the problem. I love the Hattori’s but they may be getting to the end of their usefulness. I have another pair of Hattori’s that I can start to use once my Achilles feels better. When I do, I’ll know to replace them soon after I reach 200 miles.