When metrics matter less, the run matters more

On December 4, 2012 By Emerging Runner2 Comments

Today’s run (street): 2.5 miles

When you first begin to run, it quickly becomes obvious how much you need to learn. I look back at my early days and realize how many bad decisions I’d made (sprinting without a warm-up, buying Nike shoes, wearing cotton socks, etc.). Once I understood that wicking clothes were de rigueur and finally learned what “PR” meant, I started to focus more on performance metrics and the technologies to capture data.

As I mentioned above, I first bought Nike running shoes, but it was primarily because I didn’t know brands. But I also bought them because they had a storage well under the insole where I could put my Nike+ chip.With the Nike+ chip and Sportband, I was able to capture interesting data about my runs including time, speed and distance. Until the Sportband display corroded (I actually went through three Sportbands, each with a MTBF of 3 months) I was able to see my pace in real time as I ran. It was exciting to monitor my progress.

I switched to Garmins after that, and studiously recorded my metrics. I analyzed my performance and tried to understand why my average pace improved or worsened from month to month. The numbers were important to me. Over the last year, I’ve noticed that I’ve stopped checking my pace as often when I run. I watch my distance and monitor my heart rate but the speed that I run doesn’t interest me much anymore. I can’t say that I’ve given up on performance (it’s always great to see when I’d paced under 9:00) but that’s not what’s important right now.

I can’t help thinking about the recent WSJ article that correlated fast paces to negative health in older athletes. Maybe that’s part of it, though my decreased focus on speed (except when racing) has been a long time coming. I ran my usual route today about 15 seconds slower than average, but I was happy because I did the run. It took years to feel that way. I wonder how long it will last.

I run in the 2nd best shoe (umm, make that sneaker)

On December 1, 2012 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Best sneaker ever? Highly debatable

Today’s run (street): 3.75 miles

Prior to this week, I had never heard of The Sneaker Report. But after a few mentions by people I follow on Twitter, I checked out the site. The reason why people have been tweeting about Sneaker Report is because of a post called The 100 Best Running Sneakers of All Time. Any list that ranks people or things will be debated, and I’m sure that’s the case here. Their choice for number one is a Nike model from 1995 (Nike Air Max 95) that looks like a cross between a Skechers Resistance Runner and the shoes the Apollo 11 astronauts wore when they walked on the moon.

The original Kinvara, better than the 3

Redemption came with the choice for number two: the Saucony Kinvara 3, that happens to be my preferred running shoe right now. But as much as I like the Kinvara 3, I like the original Kinvara more, because it was groundbreaking and (in my opinion) a little more responsive. The other choices seemed odd to me and many appeared to be selected for the way they look. I shouldn’t be surprised since the site refers to running shoes as “sneakers.”

After battling pounding headaches and exhaustion earlier in the week, I’m almost back to my old self. I took it easy on the treadmill yesterday in terms of speed but I set the incline at 2% to get my heart rate up a bit. Today I planned an outside run and though the temperature on the local news station showed 41°, I bundled up with extra layers. That turned out to be a good decision because it felt far colder than low 40’s, especially when the wind was blowing. My Kinvara 3’s did little to insulate from the cold and I’m wondering if I need a winter shoe.

Since I’m not fully back to strength, I decided to keep my distance in the 3 to 4 mile range. I felt fine as I ran but, after a mile, I noticed that my legs were feeling heavy. I was running a high 9:00 pace and my heart rate was low, so I just kept moving. I can’t say I enjoyed the workout, but it wasn’t like I was suffering. Once I reached three miles I started to follow roads that headed back toward my house.

This has been a week of moderately easy running and I’m fine with that. I’ll probably target 5 or more miles tomorrow. I’m certainly not in speed or performance mode these days. After reading the WSJ.com article last Tuesday, I’m not so concerned about performance. At least I’m not this week.

October made me a runner

On October 8, 2012 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Burning up the treadmill four years ago

October has been a significant month for me in my history as a runner. Modern history I should say, because my running experience in the early ’90’s (and before that) is hazy and undocumented. But in August of 2008, I took my first running steps during my walking workouts. I steadily increased the ratio of time I spent running during my walks, all through September, and then into early October.

The reason I know the details of my early progress is because I’d used a Nike+ wristband and chip and I’m still able to look back at my workouts and see the histograms that show my pace and distance. It’s interesting to see the first run/walks, where I traveled at about 15:00 min/mile, with short sections dropping into the 10:00 range.

A scan of the log shows that I averaged 9:34 per mile on October 21, 2008, making that my first full run over a mile with no walking. One year later I ran on a relay team at the Cape Cod Marathon where I achieved a then-personal record distance of 8.75 miles (over two relay legs). Two years after that, I took my big spill on the driveway at the end of a morning run that scraped me up so badly that I still have scars a year later. You have to take the good with the bad.

I guess the longer your running history, the more you’ll have to look back on every month. Still, I’ll always look at October as a most important month, because that’s when I truly became a runner.

Rethinking GPS versus foot pod

On September 26, 2012 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Today’s run (treadmill): 2.5 miles

My first method of capturing running data was with the Nike+ chip that fit into a concave spot located under my shoe’s sock liner. The accuracy of the this system was surprisingly high, but the software was buggy and the wristband that displayed metrics like pace, time and distance had serious corrosion issues. After going through three of these wristbands in less than a year, I got my money back and bought a Garmin FR50.

FR60

The Garmin 50 (and after that the FR60) uses a foot pod that works in a similar way to that Nike+ chip and I got used to tracking my distance and pace that way. The foot pod needed to be calibrated each time I switched running shoes (in my case, frequently) but the accuracy was very high. I started running with the Saucony Hattoris that have no laces to hold a foot pod, and made the switch to the Garmin FR210 GPS watch thinking I’d be upgrading my experience.

As it turned out, after almost two years, I’ve discovered I’ve given up more than I’ve gained by switching to GPS. The accuracy of GPS (~ 3%) is far worse than with the foot pod (~ 1%). The foot pod also captures cadence, an important metric, but the FR210 does not.

FR210

I had an amusing experience on the treadmill with the FR210 this morning. I wore the watch to capture my heart rate but, even indoors, it had locked in on satellite. When I finished my run I saw that the watch had recorded my distance at .14 miles. I’ve been considering using the FR60 again with the foot pod for treadmill runs. But for outdoor runs, I have to say the one big advantage of using the GPS watch is that there’s no fussing with calibration or switching foot pods. Nothing’s perfect, but at least I have a choice.

I’ve got a secret (running shoe)

On May 17, 2012 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Yesterday’s run (treadmill): 25 minutes

I’m having another busy week that has caused me to miss two blog posts and today’s workout. I’m hoping to get back on track tomorrow. In the meantime, I’ve been enjoying the experience of testing a new pair of running shoes for a company that I cannot name. In the past, I’ve been provided a good number of running shoes for review, but these models were already available in stores. I did receive my Kinvara 3’s a month before retail launch, but had no influence on their design.

The shoes I’m evaluating are a work in progress and they will surely change before hitting the stores. I’ve done two runs in them (both indoors) so I’m curious to see how they feel on the road. They happen to be the type of shoes I’d consider as a primary trainer, and that makes the testing especially interesting. I filled out my first feedback report yesterday and liked being able to share my opinions with those who can shape the final product. I’ll provide all the details once the testing is done (and I get an okay from the company to do that).

This video ad from Nike has been going around for a while, although I only saw it this week. I’m not a fan of Nike running shoes (my test shoes are not Nikes) but I really liked this commercial. It made me laugh when I watched it.

Polly Pocket, your running shoes are here!

On March 24, 2010 By Emerging Runner2 Comments

Today’s workout (elliptical/high resistance): 25 minutes

This past weekend I stopped into our local bike store, Bicycle Planet, which was displaying big signs in their windows that said “Clearance Sale.” But I wasn’t looking for bike gear. This store carries performance apparel from makers like Sugoui, Pearl Izumi and Craft along with other quality brands that specialize in cycling. I was hoping to find a bargain on long sleeved tech shirts that I could use on cold morning runs but even with the sale the clothes were pricey. There were some heavier jerseys with zip fronts that were well priced. Since cyclists ride 3-4X faster than I run they clearly need the wind protection. These jerseys were nice but they didn’t meet any current needs so I ended up leaving empty handed. I’ll be back soon with my Trek bike which needs a serious tuneup.

The next day we paid a visit to the outlet stores and I did my usual rounds at Adidas (poor selection of running clothes, no bargains on running shoes) and Nike. Nike had little running apparel on display and, for what they had, the prices weren’t compelling. I don’t care for Nike shoes but I was curious to try a pair of Zoom Equalon 3’s that were on special for $80.00. I didn’t like the fit and I guess I’m a little biased since my last experience running with Nike shoes was fairly negative. I stopped in at Reebok because it was there (did you know Adidas owns Reebok?) and, again out of curiosity, tried on a pair of their top of the line stability shoes.

Every time I try on Reeboks I understand why no one I know runs in them. The shoes I tried on Sunday felt clumsy, with an awkward transition from heel to toe. As I was leaving I noticed a display for the new ZigTech shoes. They only had smaller sizes to try but I looked at the display models and wondered what the fuss was about. The shoe is bizarre to begin with – a weirdly shaped boot with a strange wavey-springy out sole that doesn’t seem fully attached to the shoe. In pictures the shoe looks interesting. In real life it looks like something you’d find on a Polly Pocket doll. I left the outlet stores without a single purchase but with a renewed respect for the gear and for shoes from the real players like Brooks, ASICS and Mizuno.

Will I run faster if I go back to Nike+?

On December 16, 2009 By Emerging Runner1 Comment

I was talking with my colleague KWL yesterday and he mentioned that he’d been running with his iPhone using the Nike+ sensor. As frustrated as I was with my Nike Sportband experience I will concede that the core technology worked very well. The corrosion of the LCD display and the eventual refusal of the Sportband to upload run data prompted my switch to the Garmin 50. All the same, the sensor, when positioned properly and correctly calibrated, did a good job of capturing data from my runs. KWL loves his iPhone and this system works for him. He showed me some data from his runs that revealed that his paces are in the high-7 to low 8-minute mile range. I’ll admit I was a bit jealous to see that, especially since he runs in training shoes, not running shoes. It made me think about why I typically run between the mid-to-high 8’s and the mid-9’s while other recreational runners are a minute or more per mile faster. Of course I know others who run in the 10-11 minute range. It doesn’t really matter though. If you’re running then you’re doing something right.

This morning my one goal was to go out and have a better run than Monday’s. Within a few minutes I could tell that I had more strength today and, while it wasn’t one of those effortless runs I’ve written about, it wasn’t a struggle either. I had a little more time today so I stretched out my route and ended up covering 2.5 miles in about 23 minutes. Along the way a thought about my cadence and wondered how I could increase it to gain more speed. Eventually I stopped thinking and just looked at the scenery as I ran, happy to know that yesterday’s difficulties were behind me.

Finally, I got a note yesterday from a fellow runner/blogger, Bjtsven , who shared some of his 2010 running goals with me. I found one of them to be very insightful: “I’ve never had a goal to run a full marathon only a half, however, friends knowing I run always ask if I’ve run a marathon. So I figure to do it once and be done.” I’m not ready to take on 26.2 miles at this point but I think that’s as good a reason as any!

Free to be free of Nike Free

On September 28, 2009 By Emerging Runner2 Comments

Yesterday I awoke to the sounds of torrential rain and percussive surf and thought I’d miss my opportunity to run in the morning. I considered the idea of running even under those conditions but I knew I wouldn’t really like it. About an hour later the skies began to clear and I optimistically changed into running clothes hoping that the rain would pass. My wife and kids had already headed across the boardwalk to the beach and I came by to say hi before heading south. I had my Adidas trail shoes on so I stayed on the sand for about half a mile before deciding that I much preferred the boardwalk as a running surface. I decided to run from end to end a few times since, according to a sign on southern end, the boardwalk measures 1 mile. In the space of that mile the area changes from neighborhood to hotels to tourist traps and then back to hotels. The one thing that’s consistent is the beautiful and inspiring water on one side or the other. The rain came back in the middle of my run but it was light and cooling. The only negative was that my glasses fogged and limited my ability to see much beyond the immediate distance. In all I covered 5.2 miles under 9:00 per mile. What pleased me about that was that the beginning part of my run was relatively slow because of the sand yet I still maintained a decent overall pace.

Later that day, after we all showered, we set off into the town for lunch and then hit some stores including Nike and Under Armor outlets. At the Nike store I saw they had the Frees so out of curiosity I tried on a pair. When I put them on I noticed they felt more like a slipper than a running shoe and when I walked on them I was surprised by how unnatural and unbalanced they felt. Maybe that’s the point but no thank you. After that we headed to the Under Armor store and I tried a pair of Apparition running shoes, also out of curiosity. At least this shoe felt supportive and balanced. I’m not really interested in UA shoes and I didn’t think at $90 that these shoes felt as good as some competing brands. I don’t really like the UA brand anyway, I’m sure the clothing is top notch but I don’t care for the hyper-competitive edge they convey in their marketing.

On the other hand my daughter happily picked up a running shirt on sale and later got a t-shirt elsewhere that said “I am a girl, I am an athlete, and running is my sport. Well said.

People plus and Nike minus

On September 19, 2009 By Emerging Runner1 Comment

One of the greatest things about my work life is that I work with some cool and interesting people. A lot of that has to do with the company itself, it takes a lot to get hired here so those that do get in tend to be the leaders in their field. It’s great to spend your days with people that you respect and also like. Not surprisingly, I met my wife here. Readers know about the amazing Adventure Girl and the Sedentary Man also has many fans. Another colleague who personifies this profile is KWL, a man with more sources of interest than J.P. Morgan Chase. I won’t go into his professional bona fides but I will say that he is my inspiration when it comes to blending activity and technology. KWL made me aware of how applications can leverage the GPS capabilities of the iPhone and it was during our division Fun Run when I first saw MotionX in action. He’s an avid cyclist and uses MotionX to record and map rides that can go 50 miles or even longer.

Now that I’m back on a – theoretically – stable iPhone (my third 3GS in two months) I’m looking to resume using the many GPS apps I have that record and map running data. Last week KWL brought me a Nike+ chip and receiver that he’d just picked up for his new iPod Nano. He went for a run with it and was impressed. I was impressed that, as a non-runner, he is capable of spontaneously pulling off 2+ mile runs whenever he feels like it. KWL suggested that I try the Nike+ app on my iPod as I ran this morning. It seemed pretty cool and when I plugged the receiver into my 3GS this morning my iPhone showed a message saying I didn’t need it, that the phone would communicate with the chip automatically.

Before long I had established a communication link with the chip that I’d attached above the laces on my right foot making it a twin with the Garmin foot pod on my left. I assigned some music to the workout, hit start and hit the street. I didn’t select a distance so the built in training didn’t encourage me to speed up or affirm my pace but the app seemed to run okay. When I got to the end I stopped the Garmin and the Nike+ app. I then hit “End Workout” on the iPhone and that seemed to delete my run because I haven’t been able to find the data ever since. That’s too bad because I never got a chance to review the Nike+ data against my Garmin that showed I ran about 5K at 8:58.

I’ll go back and read the instruction to see what I did wrong and try the Nike+ again tomorrow. I’m curious to see if it’s accurate but my hopes aren’t high for the technology. After my Nike+ wristband experience my expectations for it are very low. But if KWL likes it it’s certainly worth another try.

Silence is golden

On June 18, 2009 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

During my last race I noticed a number of runners were running with music players strapped to their arm or hung around their neck. I know that many people listen to music while they run and if it works for them, great. It’s a personal decision and I’m sure it can be inspiring to attack an imposing hill or forcing yourself to do that extra mile accompanied by an energetic soundtrack.

I choose not to run with music for a few reasons. First, I find it distracting. For me the best thing about running is that it transports me to a quiet place where I can think – or not – as I move along. I’ve written about running at 4:00 AM and how much I enjoy the silence of that experience. Second, the need to wear ear buds as I run is a big annoyance. The one time that I tried it the tugging from the ear buds bothered me so much that I pulled them off and tossed them away. Fortunately I was on a treadmill so I could do that. When I saw those other runners listening to music while competing it made me think they were less serious about their commitment to the run. This is a race people!

Lest you think I’m some kind of hyper judgmental person I’ll concede that music can be a great companion for some. Perhaps those in the race were using the music to help them focus. I know there is a Nike+ iPod app that coaches you as you run. Maybe these iPod wearers were actually doing it for competitive advantage. I will be getting an iPhone soon, primarily for business related research. I am thinking about whether I would try the MapMyRun or other location aware applications that use the GPS signal to communicate speed, distance and other metrics in real time. If I did that would I also consider listening to some music since I’m lugging the thing around anyway? I’m thinking I wouldn’t but you never know.