New life for some old gear

Aging like fine wine

Today’s run (street): 4.3 miles

I was recently in SA Elite looking at their holiday sale items. They had ASICS running vests for 20% off, but the price still seemed high for a jacket without any sleeves. Since then, I read a piece on winter running that mentioned the benefit of keeping your core warm on very cold days. A warm core helps keep your extremities and the rest of your body warm.

I didn’t buy a running vest, but with this morning’s wind chill, it felt like 28° outside. Rather than put on two long sleeve layers, I put on an acrylic fleece Sports Illustrated promo vest that I had from my Time Inc. days. The vest is lightweight and has a mesh liner inside. After a decade using it to keep warm in my office, it had a new use.

After choosing the vest, I needed to pick the shoes I’d wear on today’s run. I’m no longer concerned that the Kayanos are causing my sciatica, but I decided to go back to my Sauconys to see how they felt on a run. The appropriation of the vest as running gear inspired me to pull my ancient Brooks Adrenalin GTS 10s out of the closet and use them instead. The 10s probably have 1,000 miles on them, but they are still viable.

I’ve always worn my Adrenalins when dealing with minor injuries because they seem to correct whatever problem is plaguing me. My shoe size has increased in recent years and the toe box is too tight for longer distances. If they were a half size bigger I’d put them into the rotation. The soreness in my glutes was there when I started, but it wasn’t as pronounced as it was at the beginning of yesterday’s run. I was hoping for a further reduction in the pain once I began to warm up.

Some mild discomfort remained throughout the run. Surprisingly enough, I found the pain to be a good distraction from the boredom of my neighborhood roads. I decided to be cautious and keep the run under five miles today. I may go further tomorrow. I’m out of the office until January 5th so I’ll have a lot more days to run during the week. I’m really hoping to be free of this soreness by the time me and my buddies do the LIRRC Hangover run on January 1.

The downside of minimal running shoes

Minimal shoe with maximal wear

Today’s run (street) 4.1 miles

I was looking at the latest Runner’s World shoe guide and noticed that the average weight of running shoes has begun to rise. The recent minimalism movement prompted most running shoe companies to develop lighter, lower and more flexible shoes to meet the new demand. I was an early adopter, switching from my heavier Brooks Adrenalins to the then-groundbreaking Saucony Kinvara. I went even more minimal with the Hattori and a pre-production pair of Brooks Pure Drifts.

The pendulum has swung the other way and new companies like Hoka are building market share with 12+ ounce ultra-cushioned models. These trainers remind me of 70’s era platform shoes and I wonder about their stability. I like to stay as close to the ground as I can when I run. The downside to staying in the minimalist camp is that, when you buy less shoe, you’ll likely wear it out faster than a conventional model.

I just noticed that my year old Saucony Vittaras (now with 425 miles on them) are starting to show some serious heel wear. These are low platform running shoes, with a 4mm drop and are very lightweight because the out-soles are mostly soft EVA with a small amount of carbon rubber. I love the shoes, but I’m concerned that this wear will lead to a shift in the way that the shoes land. That could affect my stride and possibly lead to injury. I’ll need to replace them soon, but I’m not going to move to the Hokas.

I ended up working from home today which allowed me to get in a rare Thursday morning run. I didn’t get out as early as I should have, and it was 80° and very humid by the time I set out. I could tell from the start that this would not be a performance run. Although the air was thick, I had no trouble breathing. I didn’t feel weighed down, but I couldn’t generate the will to push very hard.

With hurricane Arthur making its way up the east coast, I’m not sure what my options will be for running on Friday. I can always use the treadmill, but the machine (like my Virratas) is wearing out quickly. Since the treadmill is my wife’s running method of choice, I don’t want to contribute to its demise. With such a limited window for running, I may be forced to use it.

Of all my running shoes, these were the best

GTS-10: like chicken soup for the sole

Today’s run (street): 2.5 miles

My feet have been bothering me lately and I’m not sure what to do about it. My wife suggested that my tendency to switch shoes, rather than sticking to one pair, may be causing the issues. She may be right. The question is which pair to use? I’ve struggled to find my perfect running shoe and I haven’t been too successful. But is the act of trying different models undermining the process?

I’ve tried a lot of shoes in the three-plus years since I’ve been running. Most were fine, some awful and a few great. But the great shoes also had their flaws. My two pair of Brooks Adrenaline’s have never disappointed (I retired the GTS-9’s after 700 miles, still using the GTS-10’s), but they are old school in design, with a high platform and ramp angle. I run with the GTS-10’s for recovery or if I detect a knee problem. A few runs in them seems to correct any issue.

The original Kinvaras were my second great model. They felt like the perfect shoe from the first time I tried them on and maintained that feel, almost to the end. But something happened and my last few runs resulted in knee pain that coincided with last year’s Half Marathon. I’m hoping the new Kinvara 3’s are sufficiently improved to ward that off after I’ve covered a few hundred miles in them.

Surprisingly, the best shoes, day in and day out, have been my Saucony Hattori’s, a shoe so minimal it lacks a mid sole. But they are incredibly runnable, comfortable and responsive. The downside is that the uppers are ripping after 300 miles. I can still wear them, but time is running out. My second pair of Hattori’s, that should feel and perform identically, don’t fit correctly on my left foot and I’ve given up on them after 67 miles. It makes me wary of getting a replacement pair for my good Hattori’s.

Right now I’m really pleased with the Spira Stingers, but I am experiencing this foot pain. I really don’t think it’s coming from these shoes and I’ll run with them exclusively until Sunday. If my foot problems improve, I’ll credit the Spiras. If they don’t, I’ll do a few runs in the GTS-10’s and hope for a quick recovery.

A return to the Hattori’s

Today’s run (street): 2.5 miles

Super minimalist ninja

Hattori Hanzō was a famous ninja and samurai who lived in 16th century Japan. I’m guessing that his sword skills were the inspiration behind Saucony’s Hattori super minimalist running shoes. I’ve put about 250 miles on mine since I’ve got them and I’ve come to love their purposeful simplicity.

For the last three weeks I’ve been running in either my Saucony Mirages or Brooks GTS-10’s in an attempt to clear up a minor pain I’ve had near my right Achilles. I figured that the greater cushioning and stability control on these shoes (compared to the Hattori’s) would help my healing. It  must not be the shoes because the pain remains, although it always goes away after a few minutes of running.

Since Sunday is race day, I thought I’d end my taper with a run in the Hattori’s. It’s a different experience going back to a shoe 1/3 the weight of the Brooks. I worried that my layoff from these shoes would cause me some calf pain when I returned to them, but I had no problems today. I ran okay but I’m nowhere near my late September peak. I think the Hattori’s provided some benefit over the heavier shoes this morning since I ran 30 seconds per mile faster than yesterday. However, that pace was still far off my target for the 10K. I guess I should reset my expectations for this race and defer my focus on performance until the following weekend when I run the Long Beach Turkey Trot.

Now it’s all about Cow Harbor

Sunday’s run (street): 3.4 miles

I knew I’d get out for a run yesterday, it just took me a little longer than usual to get going. At around 10:00 AM, my wife ordered me out before half the day was gone. I complied and headed upstairs to change.

The weather was cool when I started and though it was sunny, I stayed dry and comfortable for the first couple of miles. I had run for over an hour on Saturday so I took it easy and focused on my form and stride. I thought about my vertical alignment and lifting my knees instead of worrying about my pace. The route that I chose was a variation from my usual morning run with almost a mile added to the end.

 I wore my Brooks Adrenalines to help protect my Achilles tendon that has been feeling sore of late. Even though it was mid-morning, the streets were quiet and I wondered if people were staying home because of 9/11. I thought about that as I was passing the neighborhood elementary school, where half a dozen soccer games were being played at the same time. I guess that’s where everyone was.

No need for crew length running socks this year

It was a good run and the right distance to start my taper for Cow Harbor on Saturday. It’s going to be a full and busy week in the office, capped off by a Friday night drive to Northport to pick up my race number. This year I’ll be better prepared for the crowds and the lack of parking. I see that the race organizers have changed from old style tracking units to bib tags. At least I won’t have to worry about the chip band cutting into my ankle like last year.

Perceived effort high plus "impossible" obstacles

Today’s run (street): 4 miles

More ow, than ouch!

I’ve been fortunate to avoid injuries that prevent my running, but lately I’ve experienced some painful tweaks in my knee, shin and Achilles tendon. These tweaks are mild and happily intermittent, but they make me wonder what’s behind them. I was reading an article on Runblogger (a very nice running site) about Achilles problems and, while I don’t think I have “Hagland’s structure”, I wondered if running in the Hattori’s is creating my Achilles issue. I began to think about running in a different shoe.

At the recent Dirty Sock 10K run, Paul mentioned that he trains in heavier cushioned shoes and races in lighter shoes. Right now he’s running in Saucony Mirages, a shoe I occasionally use for training and racing. The Mirage is a luxury ride compared to the Hattori’s, but it’s still low and relatively flat. I decided to dust off my Brooks GTS 10’s, a terrific shoe that I’d shelved for running due to their built-up platform.

Chicken soup for the foot

I went out purposely slow on this humid morning and intended to keep it that way. I know that an easy run should follow a hard run and yesterday’s speed work was just that. The Brooks felt really good and I cruised along for a couple of miles but picked up the pace after the second mile. By the time I reached 3.25 miles I was feeling a little fatigued. I thought about the idea of running to perceived effort versus a time goal. Over the next quarter mile I perceived plenty of effort as I approached the hilliest part of my route.

When I crested the highest section I took off fast and finished my run breathing hard and sweating heavily. I knew I’d probably pushed too hard and possibly invited further injury. My Achilles felt slightly sore and my right knee felt tender. But overall, I think I’m okay. My perceived effort certainly exceeded my performance metrics, but so what? As long as my injuries got no worse and my training advanced, I feel that I’m going in the right direction.

We’re getting close to the end of summer so, today, the Emerging Runner family held our “Impossible Obstacle Course” in the backyard. Due to the effects of hurricane Irene that landed lots of branches and leaves in the pool, we didn’t include a swimming portion. The event consisted of activities like soccer ball dribbling, basketball shooting, hockey stick bowling (don’t ask), a lacrosse throw and some running.  It was a nice second workout and we all had fun. Best of all, my knee and Achilles felt fine, both during and after.

Happily, not all treadmill runs are the same

Today’s run (treadmill): 2.41 miles

Despite the inherent lack of variables of the process, not all treadmill runs are the same. Yesterday’s run was very different from today’s. For one thing, I wore my Brooks Adrenaline’s instead of the Karhu’s and realized how much the right shoes matter when running on the treadmill. Second, I had no issues with fatigue this morning and I jumped into a faster pace from the beginning. The biggest difference between today and yesterday is that today I felt like I was running. Not running in the treadmill sense, where your are physically and mentally constrained within an area no wider than a 22″ tread and no longer than the safety cord allows. I was able to focus on my form and actually pictured the streets in my neighborhood as I ran along. If nothing else, it helped pass the time. For me, anything that speeds me through a treadmill run is a good thing.

Back on the Karhu Fast 2’s

Karhu Fast 2 — I wish they ran as good as they look
Today’s run (treadmill): 2.3 miles
I didn’t want to deal with dark and icy roads this morning so last night I set up my gear for a treadmill workout. As much as I prefer running outdoors I do appreciate the time that I save in the morning by staying inside. I would usually choose my Saucony Kinvaras for the treadmill but the soles were caked with grime — a combination of road salt, sand and mud. I wore the Kinvaras on Saturday after the snow plows and the residue from the street made them unsuitable for the tread belt. I decided to give the Karhu Fast 2’s another chance. I was curious to see if I liked them any better after a few week’s layoff.

I was tired this morning and needed my alarm to wake me up. I knew from my energy level that today would be a maintenance run and nothing more. I started slower that usual, around 6 mph, and gradually built my speed to 7 (an 8:34 pace). The Karhu’s did fine but they just don’t feel ideal for my stride. It may just be the height of the mid sole. Its “fulcrum” feature also may not well with my mid foot landing style. That didn’t mean the shoes failed to perform, in fact they took everything I threw at them. It was really about the feel compared to my Kinvaras and GTS-10’s that move more naturally with my foot. I had a decent run this morning and I managed through the treadmill experience despite the combination of boredom and terror that comes with that. I may treat myself to the elliptical tomorrow depending on the weather.

Running shoes: Less is more (and more are coming soon)

An interesting line of minimalist shoes coming soon from Merrell

Today’s run (street): 3.85 miles

I’m really loving the blog Minimalist Running Shoes where they review some of the lesser known brands and models on this eponymous site. Like the shoes they cover, the site is simple, with a handy method of rating the shoes against a number of criteria. I just read about Merrell’s upcoming (for 2011) line of “barefoot” running shoes: the Trial, True and Tough Glove models. There are also woman’s versions called Pace, Power and Pure. There are many minimalist shoes on the market or coming in 2011 and this conflicts me greatly. I already own seven pairs of running shoes (plus a few pair of retired trainers) and it’s hard to justify another purchase.

I’ve been fortunate to acquire a number of these pairs through the review process so that’s another channel to pursue. I love the Saucony Kinvaras that have helped me transition to a more neutral, mid foot, style of running and the smart thing would be to buy another pair after my current ones wear out. However, if I do that I won’t have the opportunity to try the Merrell’s, the New Balance Minimus, the Brooks Green Silence and a bunch of other minimalist models that sound compelling. Borrowing from that old cliche: so many running shoes, so little time.

This morning I went for my third run with the Karhu Fast 2 Fulcrum Rides. My plan was to go out normally and adjust my pace with the conditions. I started out well and the shoes were fine, although I do wish the differential between the heel and front foot was smaller. The mid-sole is chunky and that helps with impact with a mid-foot strike but I’ve become used to a lower riding shoe. I ran in my Brooks on the treadmill yesterday and while that has a fairly built up heel, the GTS 10 feels more stable. I enjoyed the run for the first few miles. It helped to be back on the street in the cold (but not frigid) air. I did need to be careful in some spots where snow, ice and slush remained on the road. I stayed hyper alert for cars and trucks on those narrow sections but happily there were no close calls.

By the end of the third mile I began to tire and worried that I may be getting sick. The anniversary of last year’s illness and the multiple times I’ve caught the flu during the last week of the year make me a little paranoid. I finished just shy of four miles. I’m mildly concerned that I’ve lost a little base conditioning over the last few weeks but I’m certain it’s related to other factors. My hope is to do at least one more long distance run before I return to the office next week. In the meantime I’ve been focusing more on getting in a few extra daily miles during this week.

Minimalist running shoes, one year later

Mizuno Wave Universe 3

Around this time last year I was reading about two models of running shoes from Brooks that were due to hit stores in early spring of 2010. These shoes, the Brooks Green Silence and the Adrenalin GTS 10, were interesting to me for different reasons. The Green Silence was the first of many shoes since marketed as “minimally constructed”, a niche that was created (or helped along) through the popularity of Christopher McDougall’s book “Born to Run.” I was intrigued by the concept of running in the mid-foot style and Brooks played up the small difference between the heel and forefoot height of this shoe. The flatter plane facilitates front, rather than heel striking. Brooks also played up the Green Silence’s environmental friendliness through its heavy use of recycled materials, soy based dyes and water based adhesives. I was hooked and counted the days until the Green Silence shipped to stores.

Brooks Green Silence

Besides the Green Silence I was also interested in the GTS 10, the successor to the GTS 9’s that I had worn and appreciated for their comfort and durability. When I visited Jackrabbit Sports to try the Green Silence I was dissuaded by the salesperson who said they lacked the structure I needed. I was then steered first to the Brooks Ravennas (that I didn’t like) and then to the GTS 10’s (that I bought). All was well with the GTS 10’s until Saucony sent me a pair of Kinvaras. I started off running shorter distances (5 miles or less) with these shoes but slowly worked up to longer length runs. I expected to have soreness due to less cushioning and lack of stability control. However, I’ve never had a problem with these shoes and they are now my go-to trainers and racing shoes.



NB Minimus



Brooks has just launched the GTS 11’s that are supposed to be even better than the 10’s but, surprisingly, I’m not that interested. The higher heel of conventionally constructed shoes don’t feel as good as they did prior to my running in the Kinvaras. I think that when my Saucony’s wear out I’ll either replace them with another pair, try the Green Silence or go super minimal with the Mizuno Wave Universe (3.8 oz. per shoe). Saucony just announced the Mirage, sort of a Kinvara for people who need stability and New Balance will soon have the Minimus based on the Vibram Five Fingers. So many choices now. I like this type of problem.



The Saucony Kinvara – my go-to shoe