The shoes I run in, ran in and revere

On June 21, 2019 By Emerging Runner2 Comments

All hail the OG Kinvara!

Unless you are a runner who follows in the barefoot steps of Abebe Bikila, chances are that you’ve put some time into selecting, using and eventually discarding your running shoes. In the ten years since running became an important part of my lifestyle, I’ve probably owned over 30 pairs of trainers. I still have a lot of them, but quite a few have been donated or trashed due to their condition. I have one pair that I no longer use, but will never give up. Yes, I’m talking to you, original Kinvara.

Now that I no longer spend 2-3 hours a day commuting, I have more time to focus on the details of life. Upping my running from three to six days a week has caused me to pay more attention to my gear. More running means more running clothes and I’m planning to go through my sizable collection of running shirts to see what to keep or donate. Today I took on the easier task of addressing the assemblage of running shoes in my gear cabinet and you can see the results further below.

Over the years I’ve owned just about every major brand of running shoe: ASICS, Nike, Adidas, New Balance, Saucony, Brooks, along with some less well known brands such as Karhu, Helly Hansen, Spira and Sketchers. Many of these shoes were sent to me by manufacturers when I was maintaining Emerging Runner’s sister site, Runner’s Tech Review. Some shoes were worn over 1,000 miles, but a couple of pairs were donated after only a few runs.

Right now, I have three categories of running shoes in my house: 1) regular rotation, 2) special conditions and 3) decommissioned. Category three is where I’ll be getting rid of some pairs. Going through my shoe collection has caused me to reflect on all my shoes and I thought I’d share those thoughts here.

REGULAR ROTATION

I try to run in a different pair every day because I read that shoes need recovery time too. Happily, I have a lot to choose from.

New Balance Zante 2

Responsive and comfortable

If I ever race again, I’ll wear this pair. Low and energetic. They remind me of the Kinvara 5, but feel a little faster.

Brooks Launch

Smooth and stable

This shoe was a surprise gift from my daughter. They would be a great everyday trainer, similar to the Adrenaline, but lighter.

Saucony Triumph ISO

If the Toyota Avalon was a shoe

When my feet are sore and I have to run, this is my go-to pair.

Saucony Kinvara 5

Light and energetic

I stopped running in these for a couple of years because of heel wear, but now they’re back in the rotation. Not quite as peppy as the Zantes, but they are running royalty nonetheless.

SPECIAL CONDITIONS

These are the shoes I wear for trails, bad weather or indoor running. I keep two of these pairs in a separate storage area and was too lazy to go get them when I was photographing my upstairs collection.

Spira Stinger XLT

Subtle as a chainsaw

This was a Runner’s Tech Review special. Turns out they are pretty decent shoes, but the gimmick (springs in the mid sole) is ineffective. I use them when I run on pavement in the rain. Good traction.

Helly Hansen Trail Lizard

Not a good choice for technical running

Super lightweight and great for racing on hard packed dirt trails. No rock plate so they can be punishing on sharp stones and roots.

Brooks Cascadia 8

Unstoppable

Handles mud, rocks, scree and steep inclines like a Range Rover. Surprisingly runnable on pavement.

Saucony Kinvara 3

700+ miles on the treadmill

This was originally my primary 10K and half marathon shoe. I switched them to treadmill duty when I got the 5s. They still look brand new.

Karhu Fast 2

Alternative treadmill runners

These shoes were incredibly awkward on the road and only slightly better for track intervals. Stiffness lessened with use and they are now a decent treadmill and elliptical shoe.

DECOMMISSIONED

An interesting assortment of the good, the weird and the ugly. Sadly, the shoes with this little guy at the end of the description (🏃) will be recycled because they are no longer runnable.

Saucony Virrata

Minimal and cushy

I really liked these shoes because they were super light and near zero drop from heel to toe. I wore them out quickly because the out sole is primarily blown EVA. Tried them on to see if they were still runnable, but alas, they are done. 🏃

Brooks Pure Drift

Commonly asked at races: WTF are those?

Brooks sent me these as part of a wear testing program. Liked them a lot but wished I’d asked for a half size larger shoe. I thought they were as minimal as a shoe could get and then Saucony sent me the Hattoris. 🏃

Saucony Hattori

Weird but awesome

This is basically a pool shoe with better materials. No cushioning at all, no laces either. Ran a few PRs with them and used them as my daily trainers until I completely wore them out. 🏃

Saucony Kinvara

Perfect

I have never loved a running shoe as much as these original Kinvaras. I wore them out to the point where I risked knee issues running in them for more than four miles. Tried them on yesterday for the first time in seven years and they still feel perfect on my foot. No more running in them but they’re staying in my collection.

Retroactive run

On March 9, 2014 By Emerging Runner3 Comments

Old faithful – Brooks Adrenalin 10’s

Today’s run (street): 4.5 miles

This morning I was looking at the the spring shoe guide in the March issue of Runners World. I’ve always liked running shoes because they are technically designed and they look cool. Most runners view a new pair of trainers as a reason to get excited about a run, which is why so many new pairs are sold every year.

As I looked at the 2014 models, two trends occurred to me. One was that most manufacturers have moved away from minimal models but are still maintaining the concept of “low drop.” This means that the height difference between the heel and forefoot is typically less than 10.” The other trend is toward super-cushioned running shoes. Models like the Hoka One One have huge out-soles that resemble the old running shoes from the ’80’s and ’90’s.

I was an early adopter of minimal running shoes, beginning with the first Kinvaras, followed by the Grid Tangents, Hattoris, and the Brooks Pure Drifts. Before that, I used to run in conventional shoes, my favorite being the Brooks Adrenalins. The Adrenalins are built to last. I got over 700 running miles out of my GTS-9’s before I switched them to being weekend casual shoes. I had a similar experience with the 10’s. In fact I still wear those every weekend.

After looking at the shoe guide, I wondered what it would be like to take the 10’s out for a run after treating them as sneakers for the last three years. I love my Saucony Virratas, but I felt like a change today and figured the nicely cushioned Brooks would provide a good break. I laced up the 10’s and they felt as good as ever. From the first steps off the driveway, I knew that they’d be fine, despite having over 1,000 miles on them.

I haven’t run outdoors too often this year, so I’m re-acclimating to pavement. The purpose of today’s run was to nudge my comfort beyond the 3 mile base that I’d defaulted to over the past two months. The shoes felt fine, but there is a difference between the 11.1 ounce Adrenalins and the 6.5 ounce Virratas. I don’t know if that extra weight slowed me down compared to yesterday, but something did.

Forgetting that for the moment, I did appreciate the well cushioned feel of the classic Adrenalins. I wondered if there is a happy medium between the two types of shoes. Apparently some of the 2014 models are leaning in that direction. New materials that perform better than EVA are being used, resulting in softer cushioning and lighter weight.

I’m not sure if I’ll include the Adrenalins in my primary shoe rotation, although I see no harm in using them for long easy runs. I’m remembering the foot issues I had when training for the half marathon in 2012, when I’d do 9-12 mile runs on the Bethpage bike trail every weekend. That might be a good way to build up my long base without going through that painful stage again. I also wonder if training in those heavy shoes would give me a performance boost when I return to the lighter Virratas.

A return to my happy place (City Sports)

On July 24, 2013 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

It looks better in the picture

Today’s run (treadmill): 3.1 miles

Much of today was spent in the city and I began the day with a high energy treadmill run. I’d considered running outdoors, but outside conditions looked a little soggy. I’m trying to focus on performance running as I prepare for my next race, and set the speed faster than normal. Soon after that, I was wishing the workout would end. I figured that the faster the pace, the faster the run would get done, so I steadily increased my speed.

I was pleased with my workout performance, although I regretted pushing so hard. With a full day’s work ahead of me, I should have thought through the amount of effort I’d expend. I ended up doing fine and didn’t fall asleep once in my meetings.

I was on my way to see friends for lunch in midtown, so I stopped into nearby City Sport to see if they had anything new. The store is only a couple of blocks from my old office and I’d go there often at lunchtime for stress relief. I’m in the market for a lightweight running raincoat and found a Brooks LSD jacket on clearance for $59. It seemed like a good deal, but unfortunately they didn’t have it in my size. I consoled myself with the thought that the black and red color scheme was fairly unattractive.

Altra Instinct

Topo RR

I checked out City Sports’ running shoes and saw that they’d added some interesting brands, including Altra (a zero drop brand with a wide toe bed) and Topo (a low shoe with a split toe design) that reminded me of my Brooks Pure Drifts. I decided I’d come back when I had more time to try them on.

Between all the walking in NYC and my treadmill run this morning, I’m up to 16K steps for the day. After the heavy downpours this afternoon I became concerned that I could be be rained out again tomorrow. The skies have since cleared and I’m hoping that lasts through morning.

Time for new shoes or just wishful thinking?

On March 19, 2013 By Emerging Runner3 Comments

Ready and willing to test again!

Mondays are rest days and that’s what I did today – sort of. I didn’t run (or cross train) but I did get all around the city on foot. I’m happy to report that, even with all that walking, my hip is feeling much better. I’m hoping the pain won’t come back tomorrow when I go out for a run. Of course, running outside may not even be an option in the morning. According to weather.com, we’ll be seeing showers throughout the day.

I’ve been thinking about my hip pain and wondering if this a warning that my Kinvaras are beginning to break down. I haven’t been wearing these shoes much lately, so it’s not clear to me if there’s really a correlation. I’ve been fortunate to get close to 500 miles on the Kinvaras and they still look good, but I’ve noticed some pronounced wear on parts of the outsole. I just got an email from Brooks asking that I update my testing profile. Perhaps I’ll be getting another pair to evaluate, just in time.

Running shoes retire too

On February 19, 2013 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

End of the line

Today’s run (street): 3.75 miles

In today’s NY Times Well section, there is an article entitled, “When to Retire a Running Shoe.” It’s a subject of great debate, because the answer can be different with every runner. The article doesn’t provide an actual answer, but it does support my view that a shoe’s cushioning level makes little difference in terms of protection. Golden Harper, the man who created Altra running shoes, suggested that a runner knows when it’s time to replace, “You get a sense for it,” he said. “Nothing hurts, but it is going to soon.”

I think about that as I consider which shoes to wear during my upcoming race. My Kinvara 3’s are nearing 500 miles. Though they have held up exceptionally well, I know that this was when my original Kinvaras came to their useful end. The other concern I have about the Kinvaras is that, despite their light weight, they’re a little soft as a racer. I’m trying to decide whether to run in the Spira XLT’s that are a little more responsive (but have their quirks), or the Brooks Pure Drift prototypes that I use primarily on the treadmill.

Today I ran in the Kinvaras around the neighborhood and I felt like I was running close to top form. The numbers didn’t back that up, but I still did better than average. It may have been the stiff winds coming from the west that slowed me down, or the fact that I left a little in reserve through most of the run. I plan a more aggressive approach on Saturday. I’ll run tomorrow then rest. I hope this rain moves out by morning so I can finish my taper with a street run.

Shorts success at the SOHO REI

On May 25, 2012 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Shorts but sweet

Today’s run (street): 3.6 miles

My office is usually a ghost town on the day before a holiday weekend. Acknowledging that, my company officially closes our office at 1:00 PM. I chose to work from home this morning instead of coming in for half a day. We begin “Summer Friday’s” next week, but this was the next best thing.

With no commute to worry about, I had more time to sleep in this morning. I’ve been feeling sleep debt lately so this additional rest was welcomed. After morning coffee and the news, I changed into my running gear and headed outside. The skies were cloudy, but free of rain. Humidity was high, but I figured that an outdoor run would be far preferable to the treadmill.

My route took me through the top of my neighborhood and then down to the bottom, and back. I ran well and ended up pacing a little better than my average. Since today was a week day, I encountered more cars than on a typical weekend morning. I spent more time than normal running on the sidewalk and was especially careful not to trip on misaligned concrete.

Although I didn’t wear them today, I finally found a pair of good running shorts with pockets. Yesterday, me and KWL went downtown to check out REI’s new location in SOHO that is having a big sale this week. It’s an impressively large store and a good place to waste a few hours if you have them. We didn’t, so we split up and headed for our respected areas of interest – cycling for him and running for me.

After considering options from Salomon, Patagonia, Mountain Hardware and REI brand, I bought a pair of Brooks Rogue Runner III’s. The shorts have a 7″ inseam, two side pockets, a small zipper pocket and an inside pouch. They’ll be great for either the street or the trails.

Brooks’s PureDrift is good news for minimalist runners

On May 23, 2012 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

A most minimal shoe – coming Jan 2013

Today’s run (street): 2.5 miles

Last night I predicted that it wouldn’t rain this morning, so I set up my gear for an outdoor run. When I stepped outside, I realized that wishful thinking wasn’t enough to ensure good weather conditions. I decided on the spot to run, despite the light rain that was falling. I figured, if conditions worsened, that I’d just turn around and head for home.

I didn’t know it at the time, but my Garmin showed that I’d covered the first mile extremely slowly. I thought I was moving well, but it’s hard to gauge your pace when you’re still half asleep. The rain had let up after ten minutes so I guess I’d picked up the pace from there. I ended up averaging 9:50 for the run, which isn’t all that bad.

I wore my test shoes again this morning and appreciated their minimal construction, low platform and comfort. However, I wished they were a little roomier on the lateral side, at the top. My toes do get a little squished, but so far, I’ve had no issues with blisters or chafing. The shoe is pre-market, so the fit will probably change many times before they launch.

Brooks announced a new model this week, with an expected launch date of January, 2013. I’m guessing I’m going to like them ; )

Two projects: Pure and Sole

On October 8, 2011 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Mis-Connecting with the PureConnect

Today’s run (street): 4.75 miles

Yesterday I had lunch with a colleague and then headed over to City Sports to look at some new items. I’d received an email this week from City Sports saying they had Brooks’s new line of Pure Project shoes. These shoes, inspired by the minimalist running movement, have been greatly anticipated. If you follow Brooks on Twitter you might think that running in them approaches a religious experience.

My lunch mate is an avid cyclist so, while he went off to look at bike gear, I made my way to the running shoe section. I was helped by a salesperson who actually knew something about running shoes. This was a pleasant surprise because I usually get people who know very little about the differences between brands and models.

My salesman asked if I’d like to try a pair of the PureConnects, Brook’s most minimal model in the Pure Project line. I tried them on and my excitement was immediately deflated when I felt how snugly the shoe wrapped my mid-foot and arch. The back and front of the shoe felt awkwardly separated. The salesperson claimed that this snugness facilitated a mid-foot landing and I told him I didn’t think it was necessary to clamp my arch to do that. I did some strides in the limited space and did not think the shoes felt especially responsive.

Undeterred, the salesperson had me try on the PureFlow model which is a little more cushioned and has a stabilizing component that, interestingly, sits opposite from the medial side of the shoe. The Flow felt better on my foot than the Connect but I still didn’t like it. I tried a quick “run” and felt no chemistry. My primary rule about a running shoe is never believe sales people when they say “They will feel better when you run in them.” Sorry, but no. If it doesn’t feel right in the store, I’m done.

The obelisk in “2001: A Space Odyssey” looked harmless too

Speaking of “projects”, this weekend I will attempt to do a console-ectomy on the Sole to replace the system board that is preventing us from adjusting the speed of the treadmill. Right now, the parts are sitting in a huge box in the living room and I’m scared to look inside. I have a bad track record with “repairs” and I’m a little intimidated by the task.

Finally, I hit the local business park this morning to practice running roads with elevation. I needed to be back early, otherwise I would have headed to Bethpage. I ran to the park and circled the loop three times before heading back home. The route is not especially steep but there is a steady incline over half the distance.

Tomorrow I’m hoping to get in some speed work as I look toward next week’s 5K. I may also try running some inclines on the treadmill. That is, if I don’t permanently destroy the new control board today.

First run with the Karhu Fast 2’s plus a Stillwell holiday run

On December 25, 2010 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Yesterday’s run (street): 3.5 miles
Today’s run (Stillwell Woods): 6.1 miles

Apparently today is some sort of holiday because Stillwell Woods was pretty empty this morning when I arrived for my run. Just a little seasonal humor folks. Merry Christmas to those of you who celebrate and for those of us who don’t, enjoy this relaxing day because tomorrow we’ll all be shoveling snow.

I’ve been off work since Thursday afternoon and have been enjoying the time off with my family. Yesterday morning I went out for my first run with the Karhu Fast 2’s. Based upon wearing them around the house, I had certain expectations for these shoes. The “Fulcrum” technology is supposed to guide a runner’s landing to a spot behind the arch to facilitate forward propulsion. After lacing up the Fast 2’s for my run I noticed a big difference in the feel between the front and back. I assumed that was an effect of the fulcrum and I held judgment until I took off.

My immediate reaction was to compare the shoes to the Kinvaras. While the Kinvaras are light and very flexible on toe-off, the Fast 2’s are very stiff at the front. Far stiffer than any other shoe I own and I own a lot of running shoes. I tried to stay open minded about this difference and moved along fairly well until I reached a slight downhill section and noticed that the lack of flexibility was causing some misalignment in my stride. As I ran further I felt an unusual amount of strain on the ankle area at the top of my right foot. It was making my leg tired and I had barely covered a mile.

I reached a point in my route where I would run straight for a while so I picked up the pace to see how they felt in a full on run. Despite the Fast 2’s promise as a speed and racing shoe I found myself missing the Kinvaras and the Adrenalins, both of which provide a more muscular response to quick turnovers. I plan to take the Fast 2’s out a few more times and try them under different conditions before I judge them too harshly. They are high quality shoes and are probably ideal for runners that prefer a stiffer ride.

It seemed like a good idea to run the trails at Stillwell this morning and it turned out great. Despite 25 degree weather it all felt good. I wore my Brooks GTS 10’s that I’ve neglected lately in favor of the Kinvaras. Even though the Adrenalins aren’t trail shoes they work well on hard packed, non-technical trails like the ones I ran today. Compared to the Karhu’s, the Brooks felt far more natural. I followed a course I knew well, a loop that weaves through numerous sections of the western end of the Woods. Each loop measures about two miles so I ran it three times. I only encountered a couple of mountain bikers today but I did see a surprising number of hikers and a few other runners. I felt great throughout the run and appreciated the short but steamy shower that followed. I hope that everyone is enjoying this holiday as much as I am today.

Tubes, zig-zags, bounces, shocks and resistors

On August 16, 2010 By Emerging Runner4 Comments

K-Swiss goes tubular

A couple of weeks ago my daughter and I were on the train heading back from the city when we stopped at a station. Directly outside our window was a billboard ad for the K-Swiss Tubes running shoe. Knowing nothing of this shoe, I judged it on design alone. Built within the outsole were a series of open “tubes” that run perpendicular to the length of the shoe. The tubes were clearly designed to disperse shock and (I’m guessing) return some energy from the impact. I just remember thinking that I would never wear that shoe in public.

Adidas Mega Bouncer

Nike’s Shox absorber

Reebok gets Ziggy

The Reebok ZigTech shoe provides a similar visual reaction. In the case of this shoe it’s a rippled outsole (e.g., “zig-zag”) that supposedly provides a flexible high energy experience. I’ve been amused by the marketing of the shoes and the fact that not one athlete who endorses them is known for their running. I don’t know if the technology works but they sure look funny.

One model of a weird shoe that I have tried is the Adidas Mega Bounce. I like Adidas as a brand so I put on a pair out of curiosity. I expected springiness but all I felt was awkwardness. So much for that. I’d put the Mega Bounce into the same category as the Nike Shox. This shoe is built with shock absorbers in the back that remind me of the air shocks I installed on my Mustang when I was in high school. This shoe seem to be popular and they are fairly pricey but I rarely see them on the feet of real runners.

Skechers resists running

This weekend I saw an ad for Skechers SRR (Skechers Resistance Runners) that looks like a cross between those ubiquitous “Shape Ups” and a running shoe. Their website claims that dramatic gains in postural, gluteus medius and calf muscle activation (???) will come with the use of these shoes. Okay, good to know. I realize that all of the serious running shoe companies have their own unique science. Brooks has DNA and BiOMoGo, ASICS has their GEL and Trussic technologies, Saucony has “Pro Grid” and Mizuno has the Wave. At least these features are integrated into the shoe in such a way that they look like serious footwear. I could say I’m not one to judge but clearly I am. The question is, if K-Swiss or Skecher were to send me a pair of their latest models, would I give them a fair shake on Runner’s Tech Review? The answer is yes. However, I guarantee most of my testing would be done in the early morning, in the dark, so I’d have the lowest chance of being seen with them in public.