Supinating is how I roll

On September 20, 2015 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Virrata out-sole wear courtesy of supination

Today’s run (street): 4.3 miles
Yesterday’s run (street): 5.1 miles

Fall is almost here and I’m loving the cooler temperatures. Unfortunately, the humidity still thinks it’s summertime. That’s true, but running conditions have improved over August’s dog days. Stepping out to mid-60’s temperatures provided a welcomed boost this morning. I had two good runs this weekend, even though my positive performance from Friday wasn’t duplicated on either day.

Yesterday I broke out of the boundaries of my neighborhood, venturing into the nearby business park and the neighborhood that connects to it. I’d targeted 5 miles and ran easy. That turned out to be a good idea because the humidity was an oppressive 88%. This morning felt cooler and a moderate breeze from the north provided a nice offset to still-present humidity. I’d considered a trail run but didn’t want to deal with mountain bikers at Stillwell. I ended up staying local.

The best thing about today’s run was that my energy level was running a few notches above usual. Feeling stronger prompted me to step up my pace and open my stride. It was during my run on Saturday that I noticed how my form has changed since dealing with my herniated disc. I still have slight discomfort in my left thigh, especially when I push my speed.

After yesterday’s run, I looked up strides and landing styles and realized for the first time that I am actually not a pronator. That label was given to me seven years ago by the salesperson at Super Runner’s in Huntington after she watched me walk across the store. That resulted in my purchase of a pair of Brooks Adrenaline 9’s that I loved dearly and wore for 1,000 miles.

Although pronators are supposed to wear stability trainers, I’ve always felt comfortable running in neutral shoes, especially the minimal variety, That explains my love for the Kinvaras and my appreciation of the Saucony Virratas that I recently replaced with the Kinvara 5s. The article I read showed wear patterns and connected them to different types of strides: pronator, over-pronator, neutral and supinator.

According to the illustrations, I’m a supinator, someone whose foot rolls outward on landing. I looked at my Virratas, the shoes with the most outdoor mileage, and the wear pattern clearly shows that I do this. So now I’m confused. Stability shoes are built with a medial post or some type of multi-density material in the mid-sole to neutralize inward rolling. I get that. What I don’t get is when I look up “best shoes for supination” most results point to stability shoes. But since it’s the opposite problem, wouldn’t stability shoes amplify supination?

While the running world works to figure that out, I’ll stick with my minimal neutral models. The only downside to that is my preferred shoes use a fairly soft material on the out-sole that is apt to wear out from all my supinatin’. Still, I’d rather run in shoes that feel right, rather than ones that are made for people who supinate. So far, that seems to be the right approach.

The pendulum of minimalism

On April 25, 2013 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

Today’s run (street): 3.3 miles

I was reading an article that said the demand for minimal-style running shoes, once a growth segment, is beginning to decline. The book, Born to Run, made many people curious about barefoot-style running, and it forced us to reconsider the merits of the shoes we’ve always bought.

A few years ago, I saw a video of myself on the treadmill at Jackrabbit Sports. That clearly confirmed that I’m an over-pronater. The salesperson recommended that I buy a beefy, medially-posted “stability” shoe to correct that tendency. After all, they said, my stride made me susceptible to knee and IT band injuries. I wished at the time that I could wear a lighter shoe, but I feared the consequences.

Hattori

I thought about all this on my run this morning. The idea that shoes with lots of cushioning would prevent certain types of injuries has been increasingly debated and challenged by many. That includes me. I wore out a a pair of Saucony Hattoris after 400 miles and I now run primarily in the Brooks Pure Drifts, Brooks’ most minimal shoe. The Hattori and Drift are both simple designs. Each shoe weighs less than 6 ounces and neither has any stability features. After more than 700 miles running in that type of shoe, I haven’t encountered a single problem.

Pure Drift

The dash toward barefoot running probably got too many people into minimal shoes too soon. Many are now going back to more cushy footwear. But the game has changed, and now even stability shoes have lighter construction. I know that many people feel that the shoe makes the runner. After 3+ years of (mostly) injury-free running, in barely-there neutral trainers, I respectfully disagree.

Puzzling find beneath my Hattori’s

On August 8, 2011 By Emerging Runner3 Comments

Hey, that’s nowhere near my mid-foot!

I did both of my weekend runs on the treadmill and used my second pair of Hattori’s that have yet to see pavement. Out of curiosity, I looked at the bottoms to see if the tread picked up a wear pattern from the belt and noticed some evidence of impact on the front medial side. That looked like I may still be pronating, even with a mid-foot strike. I also thought that it may just be belt dust that attached to the out-sole.

When I looked at my primary pair of Hattori’s I was quite surprised to see that both heel pads showed clear evidence of wear towards the outside edge of the shoes. These are outdoor shoes and there’s no other explanation except that I’m still pushing off the heel at some point in my strike.

This is puzzling because I know I’m landing on my mid-foot when I run in the Hattori’s and the white EVA shows an imprint that supports that fact. Clearly there are two points of contact when I land and I’m guessing that I glance off the heel and then strike ahead of the arch. No too bad but not what I want. Perhaps I’ll make a trip to a local running store in the next couple of weeks and ask to have my gait videoed. Even if my theory is confirmed I’m not sure if there’s much I can do unless I want to go back to a lightweight stability shoe.

Kinvaras as a daily trainer?

On October 11, 2010 By Emerging RunnerLeave a comment

These cool Kinvaras are becoming my everyday shoe

The transition to fall weather makes me happy. Although it will take some time to adjust my running gear so that I don’t go out under-dressed like yesterday, I still welcome the change. This morning the temperature where I live is 51 degrees, perfect for a run but quite chilly when standing on the train platform. I always wish for this weather when enduring the heat of summer or the frigid cold in January. I’ll enjoy it as long as I can.

I wore my Saucony Kinvaras during yesterday’s run and I’ve started to really appreciate them. Lightweight but not insubstantial, they are minimally constructed but still reasonably supportive. The Kinvara is a neutral shoe and I thought I’d have trouble with it because I pronate when I run. I’ve had some 8+ mile runs with them without experiencing any problems with my knees or legs and that brings me to question the idea of stability shoe engineering. I suspect that because the drop off between heel and forefoot of the Kinvara is only 4mm, compared to 12mm, (common for standard trainers) the shoe facilitates a more natural mid-foot landing. This would logically neutralize the effects of pronation. I continue to rotate through my other pairs and still consider my Brooks GTS 10’s my everyday shoe, but the Kinvaras are forcing me to rethink that these days. If I do move primarily to the Kinvaras I’ll need to consider their durability and the thermal properties of the barely-there uppers compared with the Brooks’ more substantial build. After all, it’s getting colder out there these days.

Does form follow function?

On July 14, 2009 By Emerging Runner2 Comments

Last night, on my way down to Penn Station, I observed a runner making his way through the crowded mid-town streets. I wondered, with all the great places to run in NYC, why he picked Time Square at rush hour. What I noticed about this runner was how inefficient he looked as he ran. His stride reminded me of Elaine’s dancing on Seinfeld with both feet splaying left and right and his elbows were swinging like a race walker. It made me wonder whether this was an extreme example of pronation or supination or just poor technique.

I began thinking about my own form and as I came into Penn I began watching my feet to see if they did anything strange when I walked. They looked fairly straight and I questioned whether that was due to my conscious observation. Walking with my head down was not smart because I almost ran into some people so I stopped the experiment without reaching a conclusion. I tried to look again during this morning’s 4:00 AM run but quickly (and smartly) chose keep my eyes focused on the road.

There are a number of running stores in NYC that have treadmills and video cameras that allow sales people to capture a person’s stride so they can recommend a specific shoe or shoe type. A ten second walk across the floor was all the analysis done to put me in my Brooks so I really don’t know if I’m an efficient runner. I’m thinking about my next pair and whether I want to price shop for what I think I want or if it’s worth paying more to find out what I really need.