Successful start to Cow Harbor training

Once again, it’s about speed

Today’s run (street): 2.5 miles

Nothing forces a runner to pay attention to their performance as much as a race. Once the registration is completed, the clock begins its countdown to the starting gun. A good outcome is never assured, but preparation is always key. With a click of the submit button on Active.com, I’ve once again committed to training for the Great Cow Harbor race.

Every race I run fits within an easy/hard continuum. On the easy end are 5K’s that are run fast but over within a short time. The hardest effort I’ve experienced over the last couple of years has been the half marathon, mostly due to covering so much distance with race pace urgency. In between are runs between 4 and 6.2 miles, some harder than others.

Of these races, Cow Harbor is the biggest event by far. With over 5,000 runners invading Northport, NY, on a Saturday morning, it’s a race experience that stands out above all others. The energy of the morning, as runners gather at the Laurel Avenue school, grows by the minute as participants move into their designated wave sections. The chill in the air gives no clue to the scorching heat we’ll experience along the course.

This morning’s chilly air gave me the spark to start my run fast and keep the pedal down until I’d finished. Everything clicked and, despite my harder than usual effort, I felt completely comfortable pushing my speed. I ended up finishing my run three minutes faster than I did last Friday. It was the first time I broke 9:00 per mile in months and I can’t remember the last time I did it at 4:00 AM.

One run doesn’t make me ready for Cow Harbor, but I’m happy with my performance on Day One of training. I have three weeks until I taper and rest and I’m hoping to continue to perform like this. Lots to do before September 15th, but I’m off to a good start.

Why golfers don’t get better and runners don’t get faster

Working towards the perfect swing

Today’s run (street): 2.5 miles

When I was a kid, my dad was into golf and he spent a lot of time focusing on technique that would improve his game. I can recall the various devices made up of ropes and whiffle balls (I called them his toys) that he’d swing in the house in hopes of improving his swing. Did they help? I’m not sure, but I should ask him.

Bringing this to today, I know people who are equally focused on improving their golf form. There are numerous magazines, websites and TV shows that provide tutorials and theory on ways to optimize your golf skills. With all these resources, you’d think anyone could measurably elevate their game. Yet, despite this help, most people can’t get past a certain level.

Running seems to be that way for me. I read Running Times, Runner’s World and Trail Runner magazines and pay attention to articles about technique and performance. I practice some of what I read and occasionally see results from the changes I made. But at the end of the day, I still run about the same race pace as I did three years ago. On a daily basis, I’m a little slower. 

I ran my daily route 19 seconds faster today than yesterday. To get where I want to be requires me to run that course 3 minutes faster than I did today. Until I commit to really doing that core and hill work, speed play, and intervals, I’ll never find myself running sub-9:00 paces on a daily basis. Resources are great, but only if you actually use them.

The performance thing I’m actually going to do

There’s nothing like the feel of hard plastic against your chest
Yesterday’s run (treadmill): 25 minutes
Today’s run (street ): 2.5 miles
If I were running the Dirty Sock 10K this Sunday, I’d probably have pushed much harder on this morning’s run than I did. Training for a race involves a different approach to daily running, where every workout counts. The Cow Harbor 10K is coming up, but I have over four weeks to get my conditioning right. This morning I moved at my default speed,which gets me around my route about 10% slower than 10K race pace.

In terms of performance, I have a long list of things “I’m going to do.” More interval sessions. More core workouts. Increase leg lift when running. Strength training. Like I said it’s a long list. While I’m good at getting out every day to do my runs, I’m much less apt to do the things that will move the needle on performance.
One easy thing that may make a difference is going back to running with a heart rate monitor. I’m reluctant to look at my Garmin during a training run because I don’t like seeing how slow I’m running. That undercuts my enjoyment of the experience and I’d rather be disappointed at the end. But I have no issues looking at my heart rate while I run and that correlates well with performance. 

I’ll make it project for this weekend to put a new battery into the HRM and sync it with my FR210. I don’t love wearing the thing, but I will. Perhaps that’s the reason I stopped using it in the first place.

A reason to appreciate my next good run

Today’s run (street): 2.5 miles

Tuesday’s post contained a quote about relishing bad runs so that you’ll appreciate the good ones. I had plenty of reason to relish this morning because I ran my route over a minute slower than yesterday. I knew I was in for a disappointing time from the beginning. I may have improved my pace in the second half, but it was fairly pathetic effort.

Every weekday morning I question my expectations for performance. I’m out of bed at 3:45 AM and standing on my driveway ten minutes later. While I’m definitely a morning person and a morning runner, I understand that my body may not respond as well after abruptly waking up  from a sound sleep. Sometimes it does respond and other times, like today, it doesn’t.

Today my legs felt leaden and that affected the fluidity of my form. Affected in the sense that I had no form. The residual tiredness, that I usually lose after a few minutes during these runs, remained. On Tuesday and Wednesday I’d pushed myself at certain times and ended up with decent overall paces. I had no appetite for that today and kept both my effort and heart rate low.

In the end, I was disappointed to see how slowly I had run. I was secretly hoping that the Garmin would show (despite my less than vigorous effort) that I’d actually flown through the course. The fact is that you get out what you put into a workout, and I contributed very little. So I’ll relish this sub-par experience knowing how much I’ll appreciate my next good run. Anyway, that’s what I’m telling myself.

Good running follows a tough trail workout

Today’s run (street): 3.9 miles

I was surprised to wake up today feeling ready for a run. After yesterday’s tough trail run, I expected to feel sore and exhausted this morning. Perhaps it helped that I knew the hardest running of the weekend was already behind me. Either way, I was out of the house before 7:00 AM for a run around the neighborhood.

Lower humidity made a big difference compared to Saturday. The first couple of miles went by quickly and, without yesterday’s hills, the run felt easy. I started feeling like I could run forever at that pace, but a glance at my Garmin told me I needed to step it up. I picked up my speed and that’s when I started to feel the effort. By the time I finished I felt like I’d done a pretty hard run.

This has not been a typical running week for me. Due to Wednesday night’s 5K, I’d rested on Tuesday and Thursday, putting me 5 miles behind where I’d normally be on a Friday. Since then I’ve covered almost 13 miles, totaling about 17 for the week. With both Dirty Sock and Cow Harbor happening soon, I’ll need to work on my base and get my weekly mileage back up to competitive levels.

Are you getting your runner’s daily requirement?

Today’s run (treadmill): 25 minutes

One thing I learned from Wednesday’s race is that I’m not working hard enough during my regular training runs. Over the past four years I’ve had phases where I’ve focused on performance and/or distance. That type of running has always paid off during races. Running fast workouts will usually produce decent finish times for 5, 8 and 10K’s. The same goes for long base training runs used as preparation for a half marathon.

Some runners that I know enjoy the challenge of running fast. They approach every workout as an opportunity to test their performance. They enjoy the work that it takes and that’s why they run.

Me? I like to run fast (or my version of fast), but mostly I like to enjoy the experience of moving along, outside, preferably along a wooded trail. Long slow distance is both a technique and a way to define the way I like to run. LSD is invaluable when doing base training, but it is only part of the runner’s daily requirement for race preparation.

If race training was defined like a food label, recommended weekly percentages would probably look something like this:

Speed runs:               15%
Tempo runs:              25%
Hill training:               10%
Base runs:                 25%
Easy/recovery runs:   15%
Cross training/core:   10%

I fall short on everything but easy runs. It’s the same thing as eating too many carbs and not enough protein. You just won’t perform as well.

This morning I decided that enough was enough so I cranked up the treadmill right away, to a speed that felt similar to my race pace on Wednesday. It wasn’t easy, but I was able to sustain it. That was probably because my last two runs were a speed workout and a race. Can I maintain this type of running going forward to the point where I’m getting my recommended doses of speed and hill training? Maybe not all at once, but a little harder training might be doable.

Race report: Corporate 5K

Registration check in. Sign those waivers!

Yesterday’s run (Corporate 5K): 3.1 miles – 26:22 (8:30 pace)

I like to keep my running life and my work life separate in this blog, but every once in a while they’ll come together. Back in June we had a summer picnic in Central Park and I organized my colleagues for a 1.6 mile fun run. Last night I participated in a 5K race that was put on by my company as part of a corporate wellness program. It was an interesting experience and a lot of fun.

This 5K consisted of employees from four of our corporate divisions that have offices in NYC. The company is holding 5K’s in other cities for other divisions based in those locations. A group of us left the office for the 1 train that took us uptown to Riverside Park, where the race was being held. The registration process started out a little bumpy but they did get through the 170 or so runners (and walkers) reasonably fast. We were all asked to sign waiver forms even though we’d already done that online.

Pre-race warm-up

Before the race, the organizers had participants run through some dynamic stretching exercises. Soon after that, we assembled behind the starting line for the race. There were a few speakers who talked about the event, the importance of fitness and how our company is contributing to charitable causes that support this initiative. This went on so long that my Garmin turned off its GPS and I had to scramble to reacquire a signal before the start.

Our course was interesting. We started at 108th street and headed north about eight blocks before turning south. This turnaround put us on a secondary path that was, at different times, packed dirt and broken pavement, with lots of twigs and branches from the trees. I gingerly avoided those branches since I was wearing my very minimal Hattori’s. There were a number of rises throughout the course and some were fairly challenging.

Our route took us by the river where we did a couple of out and back loops before heading north again toward the finish. This was my first evening race and I expected to struggle but I didn’t feel much different than I normally do. The out and backs provided an opportunity to see my position in the race because I would pass the the leaders going the other way. At other times, I could see those who were behind me.

The race ended with a straight section of recently paved blacktop and I ran hard to the finish line. A number of us questioned the length of the course because our GPS watches showed it to be less than 3.1 miles. I looked at my run in Garmin Connect and saw that the signal had drifted in a number of spots. That usually accounts for distance loss since the GPS often “cuts corners” due to sampling frequency.

After crossing the line, we spent a few minutes recovering. After that we claimed our bags and headed back to the subway to get us to our trains and buses. Others stayed for drinks and hors d’oeuvres but most of just wanted to get home. I have to say that all my colleagues did well. KWL finished in the top 10% and FS also finished high. Everyone else came in around mid-pack, as I did. With the majority of runners in the 20-29 age category, I think we did just fine.

Will a late day start ruin my race?

I woke up with some calf soreness and I figured it related to yesterday’s running in the Hattori’s. Although I’ve been running in low shoes like the Kinvara 3’s and my Brooks test shoes, neither pair offer a zero drop experience like the Hattori’s. The difference is only 4 mm, but that could be enough to aggravate my calves. After thinking about it more, I’ve concluded that the soreness actually came from running at speeds I haven’t attempted for well over a month.

I’m curious to see how I will do during Wednesday afternoon’s race. I can’t think of a time when I’ve run late in the day and thought I’d performed particularly well. I’ve done all that I can to maximize my readiness, including Saturday’s 6 miles and yesterday’s intervals. Two days of recovery from my weekend running will get me to Wednesday. Since the race is at 6:00 PM, I’ll get another half day’s rest. Perhaps that additional recovery time will counter-balance the performance hit that I expect to take from that late day start.

Accel Gel gives protein a good name

More syrupy than gooey, but worth a try

Today’s run (street): 5.5 miles

Compared with yesterday’s weather, today is paradise. The sun is back, and the temperatures are moderate. The humidity is higher than I’d like, but completely bearable. I rested yesterday and was more than ready to get out for a run this morning.

I tested Chocolate #9 energy gel earlier in the week with good results. It seemed to deliver on its promise of preventing sugar highs or lows and I will definitely pick up a few more, next time I’m at REI. This morning I tried another brand called Accel Gel from Pacific Health Labs that claims to provide rapid energy to muscles using a (patented) formula with a 4:1 ratio of carbs to protein.

Almost everything I’ve read about effective energy supplements supports an ideal mixture of simple and complex carbs, along with amino acids and, occasionally, caffeine. Protein is usually relegated to post workout recovery, since it doesn’t convert easily to glycogen. The Accel Gel website states that the protein in the mix is helpful for both endurance and muscle recovery.

I took an Accel Gel (vanilla flavor) about 15 minutes prior to my run, with water. The gel wasn’t thick like GU. It felt and tasted more like sweetened vanilla extract syrup. Gels aren’t intended to be consumed as snacks. If they were, I’m guessing few people would choose this brand. I’m not saying it was bad, but I didn’t love the taste.  

Like the Chocolate #9 gel, this Accel Gel helped get me through the initial minutes of my run with good energy. I wondered whether this feeling would reverse itself later, after a few miles of depletion. I think there may be something to the endurance claim, because I didn’t feel run down after 50 minutes of running in the sun, heat and humidity.

Running is as much about your head as your body, and today, my head felt a bit tired. Interestingly, my body was ready to work, and I managed to move along well despite feeling like I was pushing too hard. Was it the gel that kept me going? Hard to know. But I had a pleasant 5.5 mile run and, even with the humidity, I didn’t come close to a bonk.

As with Chocolate #9, more testing of Accel Gel is required. However, I was pleased what I’ve experienced today. GU Roctane is still my go-to gel during races, but it’s always nice to have other options.

Father’s Day on the run

Nothing like a good run to start things off

Today’s run (street): 4.3 miles

It’s Father’s Day and I am happy for a number of reasons. First, I’m getting to spend the day with my family doing the things we like to do together. That started yesterday when my son and I went to see the movie Prometheus. We’d waited a long time to for this movie to come out and although it didn’t live up to expectations, we had fun dissecting the plot and debating the meaning of the film.

Today’s activities revolve around the whole family. Before we got the day started, I went for a run around the neighborhood. The temperature and humidity are expected to rise as the week goes on, but this morning was cool and partly cloudy. I wore the Spiras for a change of pace and they felt good as I started up the road. The cool air was energizing, and there were a lot of neighbors outside who greeted me as I ran by.

I’d originally planned to cover about three miles easy, because I knew I had a big day ahead and I’ll have plenty of time for longer runs this week. The run felt so good that I added some extra streets to my route that increased my total to 4.3 miles. As far as it being an easy run, I hit the accelerator at the two mile mark and that put my pace into normal training range.

I was pleased that this “easy” run turned out to be a better workout than expected. One of many reasons why this is a happy Father’s Day weekend.